The Best Video By A Conservative

30 11 2008

I’m not going into a long explanation, this guy can do that for me. This is one very insightful, yet very funny vid. Enjoy all!

Pass this one on. Everyone will thank you!

 

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me





Liberals Hate The Constitution

30 11 2008

Yep, I’m now convinced that liberals hate our Constitution. Two of them in right-to-bear-arms_editedparticular… The right to bear arms, and the right to free speech. I will cover the free speech aspect in another thread in the near future, if the libs have not shut me down by then!

In this post I will once again be covering the 2nd Ammendment, but since we have just gotten over Thanksgiving, I’m going to keep this post fun and enlightening. Below I have copied some comments from another highly touted liberal blog. While reading their comments try to keep in mind that these are all Obama worshippers. This may scare you a bit so keep the lights on while reading them. And by all means, enjoy…

 

 

“Generally speaking, the more guns a person has, the less balls they have to actually use them.”

And you know this how genius???

“BushCo funds private mercenary armies on American soil.
BushCo tortures people. Spys on everyone, Gives Billions to cronies, corrupt the justice system, shreds the constitution, makes plans for a state of Emergency American dictatorship”

You can tell the person above spends all their time listening to left wing morons!

“Listen, do we really want angry republicans arming themselves to the teeth?”

That would be a YES! We may be the last line of defense.

“It is time the NRA loses its grip on Washington.”

If the NRA has such a grip on D.C. why do we have so many gun laws?

“I will be purchasing my first gun this Tuesday. I am a 39 yr old woman. I made this decision after watching hollywood, newspapers, and television play psychological games with the american people which greatly impacted the outcome of this election.–What made it even more horrible is that their candidate is on a first name basis with well know anti americans.What kind of fool would ever feel safe in this country again?”

This is one smart woman. Obviously not a lib.

“I think all the gun lover are sexually frustrated and rationalize their fear of letting by owning a gun to defend their moral “values” or whatever values they can get their hands on. What America need now is a big orgy to release all the pressure that has been piled up after
all of these years of unhealthy puritanism and incestuous bigotry”

Definately a lib!

“They are paranoid white extremists, who feel this country has been taken over by minorities, and they seriously see themselves as a threatened minority. Wienies.
I favor banning guns. Period.”

I guess this person never saw Koreans in Los Angeles during the Rodney King riots, defending their stores with firearms. I would put this person in the ‘ignorant’ catagory.

“Just as in the frontier days, when the new sheriff comes into town and says “No firearms within city limits or else” so that civilized townsfolk will be safe, so be it today.”

This moron is refering to Obama. Thanks for validating what we fear happening you dolt.

“We live a lot safer over here without this pathetic gun worshipping, period.”

This guy is British. Nuff said!

“Guns don’t kill people- whack-job ideologues with semi-automatic weapons kill people!”

That’s the exact reason why we don’t want more libs owning firearms.

“Great…just what we need…a bunch of right wing gun n*ts running out to get assault weapons. Sheesh. Just stay away from me and my family. There is no reason anyone outside of a war zone needs assault weapons. You people are scary.”

My County is mostly Democrat, and most of them own guns, lot’s of em’.

“There is NO GOOD REASON ON GOD’S GREEN EARTH for a civilian to own an assault rifle.”

Wanna bet!? When you and your Commie loving friends comes to take my firearms, you will figure it out. From under God’s green earth!

“I’m not confused. I’m pretty clear- they have no business in the hands of the general public.”

Yeah, I agree. I don’t want guns in the hands of the general public either, as the genarl public would include dangerous felons. However, I do want them in the hands of law abiding citizens.

“NRA under Wayne LaPierre’s leadership has become a dangerous advocate in a nation awash in gun violence. The fear of blacks, “zionist government”, zionist blacks.. jackbooted gay thugs.. or an army of Barbara Streisand clones marching in lockstep down main street in Little Rock one Sunday morning are all fears stoked by the right wing to keep guns primed and purchased.”

Yep, definately another hard core lib. Thier nonsensical writings are a dead give-away.

“Quick ! Get all your guns, ammo, bottled water, dehydrated food, and crawl down into your underground bunkers! Hurry! We’ll tell you when it’s safe to come out …………NOT!”

Oh no, it won’t be that easy. You and your ilk will have to come and get us, if you have the nerve.

“Yes! Run little sheep! Run to your gun shop before the Big Bad Obama takes away all your boom boom sticks. Oh, wait. He’s got too many important things to deal with to worry about your silly little phallus collection.”

Gee, ye think this person knows yet that Obama has chosen Eric Holder* as his Attorney General?

“California gays should be the ones in line buying the guns!”

Uh, what the hell doeas this mean? Never mind, I really don’t care.

“The gun laws in the USA are medieval and endangering to the citizens. Time to wake up and join the civilized world.”

Probably another one from Britain. Why do these people always want to tell us what to do? My guess is… some sort of inferiority complex.

“The powerful NRA keeps on poisoning minds and hearts with ridiculous claims for safety and constitutional rights. Knowing, that to die from a gunshot related wound is the main reason for the deaths of young black American males is disgusting and shameful.”

The logic above defies all logic. Unless of course, a white man has never been killed by a gun. What nonsense!

“We need to divorce ourselves from the 19th century mindset that concealed weapons make for a safer society.”

See my quote in blue below.

“Your country was built on violence and the NRA keeps feeding your illusion of freedom by owning guns. With or without Obama,you have a lot to learn about a modern,progressive society, not willing to tolerate violence as it is in the USA today.”

Hmmm, the USA Today is a Newspaper, right? Bad joke aside, we do not tolerate violence and that’s the exact reason we want to be able to defend ourselves. Moron!

“Too bad that Obama WON’T be going after the guns, it would make the US a safer and freer place.”

If you don’t believe he will severely limit (come after guns) gun ownership, then you have not been paying attention.

“Fu*king rednecks!”

No comment! In my mind however, I am saying Fu*king liberals!

——————

* BELLEVUE, Wash., Nov 19, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) — The nomination of Eric Holder for the post of attorney general of the United States sends an “alarming signal” to gun owners about how the Barack Obama administration will view individual gun rights, as affirmed this year by the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment Foundation said today.
Eric Holder signed an amicus brief in the Heller case that supported the District of Columbia’s handgun ban, and also argued that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right,”

 Now wasn’t that fun? Below is one of those little facts that liberals also hate…

Kennesaw Georgia, where gun ownership is mandatory, has the lowest crime rate in the country, and Chicago, where guns are banned, is the murder capital of the country.

 

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me





Not My President

30 11 2008

I am now totally convinced that Barack Obama is not eligible to take the oath of worlds2020liar20aleoffice for the highest elected position in the United States of America. Of all the places in the media to finally start talking about this subject, it’s MSNBC to cover it (see video below). I’m sure they will be getting a call from the Obama camp!

Just prior to Thanksgiving, I posted What The Heck Is Going On?, so consider this an addition to that post. With all the questions concerning Obama’s natural birth country, it does raise a rather interesting problem. If he does not present actual proof of country of birth prior to him taking the oath of office, should we consider him our president? My own opinion is a resounding NO. And it could lead us into a mine field never before seen in this country. For instance… what if he does take the oath and then we find out that he’s not eligible, does he then become a criminal? Will he have broken laws concerning fund raising? Is he brought up on charges because he took the oath of office knowing he was NOT eligible? Who thentakes his place? Does it invalidate the whole election? Etc, etc.

Another possible problem is his followers… Obama has been elevated to the status of Messiah in the eyes of many of his followers, so how do they react to news of his ineligibility. Do they march in the streets demanding he still be POTUS? Guessing this problem would end up before the Supreme Court, and the Court decides he is not eligible, do his followers accept it, or demand the Supreme Court reverse their decision? What if his followers decide that the Courts decision is invalid and they ignore the decision? Will this create a Constitutional problem never before seen in this country? Etc, etc.

I’m sure I’ve missed many questions this brings up, but find myself not being able to come up with good answers. However, if we do find out that Obama is NOT a natural born citizen, we will have been witness to the largest scam ever conceived on the planet. With all the above taken into consideration, would it not be better for him to just produce his real place of birth now? C’mon Obama prove us all wrong, if you can!

h/t to Giovanniworld member Ted for the following video. This is just another nail in the coffin for Obama’s presidential scam, unless of course he can prove otherwise.

Until Barack Obama can prove he is a natural born citizen, he will never be my president. Nor will I ever consider him the President of the United States of America. We should NOT call him president until he clears this up. Do you agree?

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me





Happy Thanksgiving!

26 11 2008

No matter what our friends on the left say, we can be thankful for living in the best darned country this planet has ever seen.

So the next time you hear a liberal complain about this country, or how it has been ruined by Christians, kindly remind them that if not for the Puritan Pilgrims, they and their family may never had existed.

samosetpilgrims





What The Heck Is Going On?

26 11 2008

h/t to Giovanniworld member Eowyn.qmark

 

The Great Birth Certificate Scandal/Cover-Up of 08
By Joan Swirsky
Monday, 24 November 2008

Analysis: Last week, newscasters reported that al Qaeda’s #2 terrorist disparaged the election of Barack Obama, and hurled racial slurs at Obama himself. The report has not been confirmed by the State Department, they all said, but they reported it anyway.

Fox News reporter Carl Cameron told viewers that three anonymous insiders of Sen. McCain’s campaign said that Sarah Palin was, in essence, a diva and a dunce. He and dozens of others who picked up the story on other channels never identified, or even verified, the sources of the quotes, but they reported them anyway.

Contrast these shabby examples of journalism with the legions of identifiable, verifiable and credible sources who for months have been investigating the disturbing allegation that Barack Obama is ineligible for the presidency because he has failed to meet one of the three requirements that the U.S. Constitution mandates, specifically that he provide proof of his natural born U.S. citizenship.

What follows is a partial list of people and organizations that have challenged Obama’s eligibility. Further on I will comment on how egregious the media’s failure to cover this story has been.  And last, I will speculate on the reason for the cover-up of this full-blown scandal.

*Attorney Philip J. Berg, former deputy attorney general of Pennsylvania and a longtime Democrat partisan, sued Obama and the Democratic National Committee for what he alleged was the DNCs failure to vet Obama, and Obama’s failure to provide an authentic and verifiable U.S. birth certificate. The suit was dismissed as “too vague.” Berg filed a writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court on Oct.30, to force Obama to produce his birth certificate. On Nov. 3, Justice David Souter rejected Berg’s emergency appeal for the court to halt the tabulation of the 2008 presidential election results, but set a schedule for a response from Obama, the DNC and all co-defendants on or before Dec. 1. Berg claims to have a tape recording of Obama’s Kenyan grandmother saying that she was present at Obamas birth in Kenya, along with his half-brother and half-sister. Here is his website: http://www.obamacrimes.com/

*According to WorldNetDaily, blogger Jeff Schreiber said a second case was presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue, i.e., the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg, possibly  among other reasons because they liked their odds of Berg’s petition getting denied. Berg said that if the FEC filed not solely on its own behalf but on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion.”

*Dr. T.B. Bradley, a forensic psychologist, stated, as part of the Berg case, that, “Upon reading all of the books written by or about Barack Hussein Obama, Jr. aka Barry Soetoro (hereinafter Obama) Applicant discerned that Obama was not a natural born citizen of the United States or if he was a natural born citizen that he had lost his citizenship when his biological mother married Lolo Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia. Obama then became a citizen of Indonesia as a result of his mother’s expatriation of herself and her son, by self declaration on legal public educational records that Obama was formally known as Barry Soetoro, a citizen of Indonesia [and] was not US Constitutionally qualified to hold the Office of the United States Senator from Illinois or the Office of the President of the United States.”

*Author, radio host, blogger, and Chicago attorney Andy Martin filed a suit in Hawaii’s Supreme Court to compel Gov. Linda Lingle to release a certified copy of Obama’s vital statistics record. His request was denied. On Nov. 18, he petitioned a judge in Hawaii for access to Obama’s original 1961 birth certificate, and reported that the judge reserved judgment. But when he arrived back in the states, he learned that Judge Bert Ayabe had dismissed the case.

*Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes filed a suit with the California Secretary of State asking that the state’s 55 Electoral College votes not be cast on December 15 until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. Keyes suit was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, along with California Electors Wiley S. Drake and Markham Robinson. The action states: “Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States, and, thereby, his election declared void.(a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.” Former California Secretaries of State have reviewed background documents to verify the eligibility of candidates. In 1968, the Peace and Freedom Party submitted the name of Eldridge Cleaver as a qualified candidate for POTUS. Then Secretary of State, Frank Jordan, found that according to Cleaver’s birth certificate, he was only 34 years old, one year shy of the age needed to be on the ballot. Mr. Jordan removed Mr. Cleaver from the ballot. Cleaver unsuccessfully challenged this decision to the Supreme Court of the State of California and to the Supreme Court.

*Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan, a retired 23-year veteran of the Army, National Guard, and Air Force filed another suit in North Carolina, which claimed Obama should not have been on the state’s election ballot because his citizenship is in doubt.

*David M. Neal of Ohio filed a suit in Warren Common Pleas Court to force the Ohio Secretary of State, Jennifer Brunner, to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.

*Cort Wrotnowski of Connecticut asked the court to order Secretary of State, Susan Bysiewicz, to verify Obama’s citizenship before allowing the candidate to appear on the state ballot. The case was denied.

*Steven Marquis filed a suit Washington State Superior Court, calling for Secretary of State, Sam Reed, to determine whether Obama is a citizen before Election Day, claiming the Hawaii birth certificate reveals neither the hospital where Obama was born nor a doctor’s name the baby’s footprint. The case was denied.

*Rev. Tom Terry of Georgia appealed to the Georgia Supreme Court the day before the election to determine authenticity of Obama’s original birth certificate and his qualifications to be president. Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter denied Terry’s request for an injunction against Secretary of State Karen Handel.

*Author Jerome Corsi, who has written extensively about this case, traveled to Hawaii and Kenya. He learned that the Certification of Live Birth that the Obama campaign posted is, according to the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands, not the same as a Certificate of Live Birth, which authenticates Hawaiian birth.

*Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. In November 2004 she said he was born at Queens Medical Center in Honolulu, but in February 2008, she said he was born in the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children. Before the election, the Internet site, WorldNetDaily, retained a private investigator in Hawaii to visit both hospitals, but he reported that sheriff’s deputies were stationed at both hospitals to fend off inquiries.

*Leo C. Donofrio a retired attorney, started a website and filed a suit in New Jersey on November 3, asking Secretary of State, Nina Mitchell Wells, for an emergency stay prohibiting Obama, Sen. McCain, and Socialist Workers Party candidate Roger Calero, from appearing on New Jersey’s ballot, claiming all three are not natural born citizens. On Nov. 6, Supreme Court Justice David Souter denied Donofrio’s application. But the case has now entered the docket of the U.S. Supreme Court and Justice Clarence Thomas has decided to send it to conference on December 5th! This means that only 10 days before the Electoral College votes, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will meet privately to discuss Donofrios case.

*Douglas J. Hagmann, director of HomelandSecurityUS.com, has reported that 17 lawsuits in 12 states are challenging the eligibility of Obama to become the next President of the United States.

*Numerous activist groups have undertaken letter-writing campaigns to the Supreme Court Justices, members of the Electoral College, and elected officials, as well as sending urgent appeals to the White House and the Department of Justice.

*Websites like Citizens for the United States Constitution, We The People, PeoplesPassion, America Must Know, and Faith2Action have sprung up in passionate defense of our Constitution’s integrity. The last of these has even posted the names and addresses of Electoral College members from each state, as well as an ad in The Washington Times.

*Dozens of petitions, like this one, have been circulated.

*And dozens of mostly-conservative writers (including Devy Kidd and Miichelle Malkin), bloggers and journalists have written about his strange case and potential Constitutional crisis, as I have in a series of articles here and here and here and here.

Coverage of the above by the media: Zero.

A DEAFENING SILENCE

It is no mystery that the leftist media have refused to mention this potentially looming Constitutional crisis in virtually all of their print and electronic coverage. Having shilled for Obama for the past two years dismissing his longtime radical associations, obfuscating his radical voting record, and taking a pass at their jobs of vetting a presidential candidate, their failure to cover the most explosive story of the 2008 campaign speaks volumes about collusion of the highest order.

Then there are the late-night comics, as well as snarky humorists like Bill Maher and Jon Stewart, who take pride in being irreverent and outing both people and subjects that others avoid. Not a word.

But what about the failure of the powerful conservative media how to explain their total blackout of this story? Lets look at their reactions:

*Fox News: Total Silence. Did the healthy shares that Saudi Arabia bought of Fox influence the networks non-coverage of this story? After all, its no secret which candidate the Saudis endorsed! We know that TV shows, including Fox, are on a seven-second delay, the better to bleep out offensive or inappropriate material. Doesn’t it strike Fox viewers as strange that not one of their outspoken guests, even once, mentioned this story? Who warned them not to?

*Rush Limbaugh: Total Silence. Why has the Excellence-in-Broadcastings Dr. of Democracy–the man who eats sacred cows for breakfast not touched this story?

*Mark Levin: Total Silence. Why has this popular radio host, commonly known as the Great One, abandoned his well-deserved reputation as a Constitutional scholar to studiously not address this Constitutional issue?

*Laura Ingraham: Total Silence. Here is another radio powerhouse and former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas taking pains not to mention this casenot a word!

*Bill O’Reilly: Total Silence. Yes, the guy who claims hes just looking out for the folksvoiceless!

*Sean Hannity: Total Silence. The iconic radio and TV host who tackles every controversial subject under the sunmissing in action!

I could go on and on, but you get the picture. The very people–the so-called loyal opposition–who should have been shouting this story from the rooftops for months on end went mute. Ordinarily they would be the first to tell you that our Republic has no more precious document than the U.S. Constitution–a document that set the stage for the greatest experiment in human freedom since the beginning of recorded history. People like me and multi-millions of others are aware of what happens when the salami tactics of tyrants are employed in the service of leftwing ideology.

First, there is a charismatic character promising change and hope, but who changes his tune once in power. Second there is a whittling down of the laws of the land and the arrogant dismissal of the documents on which the nation was founded. Third there is the blacking-out of all media that disagree with Dear Leader’s message. And fourth there is the rounding-up and incarceration or worse of all dissidents.

This is not theory. This is history. But while both left and right media thought it appropriate to comment at length about Obama’s seven-page Questionnaire for those seeking work in his administration–a probing that makes a Pap Test, mammogram, colonoscopy, and endoscopy in one visit seem mild by comparison–not one of these cowardly journalists has asked the simple question: Mr. Obama, where is your birth certificate?

Or were they not cowards but patriots?

SCROUNGING FOR ANSWERS

I’ve written several books, not one of them fictional. And thousands of articles, not one of them based on sinister suspicions or conspiracy theories. But the case of the U.S. media’s complete non-coverage of this major story has gotten me to speculate on what–or who–may be behind this phenomenon. What force could be so powerful as to silence our country’s putative guardians of free speech–the titans of the Fourth Estate?

Perhaps the mystery goes back to 2004, when President Bush won his second term in office and in his first press conference in the White House said that he had “earned political capital and intended to spend it.”

Then  suddenly and inexplicably he went into a year-long hibernation. He rarely appeared in public and gave no major speeches. Finally he reemerged albeit weakly, in late November or early December of 2005

Could it be that shortly after the president’s reelection, he and major government officials received highly credible evidence from America’s ruthless Islamist enemies that they had a number of devastating (probably
nuclear suitcase) weapons–set up and ready to be activated in as many as six-to-10 of our major cities–unless he (the president) tacked left and played nice for the following two years?

Was America taken hostage?

The president, one could speculate, had only two choices: (1) play chicken and possibly sacrifice the lives of millions of Americans and the destruction of major American cities, or (2) opt for the lesser of two evils, the second being to pave the way for a dangerous Trojan Horse, qualified or not, to capture the White House.

Could it be that the media blackout of the most explosive story of any presidential election in American history has been choreographed by none other than the current POTUS, the most powerful man in the entire world? This would certainly explain why President Bush has not been himself since January 20, 2005. It would also explain why the all-powerful media have taken his marching orders including the New York Times, which takes particular pleasure in undermining and sabotaging the president, even when it comes to national security issues.

If this happened, it would have had to involve the highest echelon in our intelligence services, who might have paid personal visits to publishers throughout the United States, as well as to top TV and radio executives, who themselves would have passed down iron-clad orders  to their anchors, broadcasters, even comedians  to follow the blackout order or face Draconian consequences.

On November 4  Election Day  the Dow was above 9,000. It is now plummeting, suggesting that even the globalists among us prefer tax cuts and capitalism to tax hikes and not creeping but galloping socialism  or what the esteemed Dr. Jack Wheeler insists is fascism.

Buyers remorse is in the air. America has been hijacked. What a price we will pay if the Supreme Court and the Electoral College abandon their oaths to uphold the U.S. Constitution by capitulating  as the media have to our enemies. God Save America!

——————————————————————————–
About the author:
Joan Swirsky (www.joanswirsky.com) is a New York-based journalist and author who can be reached at joansharon@aol.com.

 

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me





Time To Man-Up America

26 11 2008

continental-army-soldiersOver the last few years I have noticed a change in the gender of those that are willing to stand up and fight for our Conservative cause. There seems to be many more females that are coming to the forefront and staking their claim in the Conservative movement than are males.

This piece is by no means a complaint. I think it’s wonderful that more women are getting involved and kicking butt. Sarah Palin being the most prominent women in the Conservative army is an excellent example, but she is not the only one. Every day that goes by, I find, or get introduced to women that are getting more and more involved. As an example… Recently, I find that there seems to be more women that participate in political blogs and politics in general, than men. This blog being just a small scale of what I’m talking about. My female readers outnumber my male readers when it comes to responding to issues brought up here on my blog. This alone tells me that they are willing to get involved and actually make a difference. Then of course you have the more public female pundits. Whether it’s print media, online publishing, blogging, TV, radio, etc, there also seems to be more female voices in the debate of a Lib vs Con ideology.

What is puzzling to me is how it seems less men are getting or staying involved. Without doing days of research on the possible ‘why’, my thoughts are these.

1. Men are working more and their wives are stay at home moms so they have a little extra time to stay involved.

2. Over the years, the Feminist Movement has been so successful in raising their sons as pansies, that there are fewer real men willing to take a stand.

There are probably many versions of both 1. and 2. but those are the two that come to mind.

All this leads me to asking you a question… Why do you think women are taking a more active roll in preserving a more Conservative country? Or do you think I’m way off base?

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me





This Years Christmas Gift – Guns

25 11 2008

While having an online conversation with a fellow blogger concerning possible americanflaghandgun-petermillerchanges in firearms laws, she mentioned something about her Brother-in-law that owns a gun shop. Here’s her first message to me…

“My brother-in-law owns a gun shop, and he’s having a problem getting through to the background check facility because so many people are buying guns now. My hubby just bought two more guns and has stocked up on ammo. We all need to practice our Charlton Heston imitation: “From my cold, dead hands!”

First comes registration, then comes confiscation.”

Out of curiosity, I asked her if she would mind asking him why people are buying so many guns at this time. About 24 hours later she emailed me the following…

“According to B.I.L. (gun shop owner), his sales have increased for the following reasons:

1. People are afraid of another ban on assault weapons
2. Tax on ammo purported to go up to 500% under Obama administration
3. Fear of riots because they don’t know what might happen
4. Increase in crime with so many people losing their jobs
5. Good barter: Can trade guns and ammo for food if we go into a deep depression”

I was only surprised by the last item on the list, but after some thought, it made very good sense. For the near future I see no slow down in gun sales, especially now that we know who Obama’s pick is for Attorney General of the USA. Read this…

Eric Holder Nomination Signals Obama’s True Anti-Gun Rights Agenda


BELLEVUE, Wash., Nov 19, 2008 (BUSINESS WIRE) — The nomination of Eric Holder for the post of attorney general of the United States sends an “alarming signal” to gun owners about how the Barack Obama administration will view individual gun rights, as affirmed this year by the Supreme Court, the Second Amendment Foundation said today.
Eric Holder signed an amicus brief in the Heller case that supported the District of Columbia’s handgun ban, and also argued that the Second Amendment does not protect an individual right,”

Then add in Obama’s own history concerning gun ownership…

“Obama would ban the manufacture and sale of all handguns.

Supports gun-owner licensing and gun registration.

Opposes four of five Supreme Court Justices who affirmed the court’s decision to uphold the individual’s right to keep and bear arms.

Voted to ban almost all rifle ammo commonly used for hunting and sport shooting.

Voted to uphold local gun bans and criminal prosecution of people who used firearms in their own self-defense.

Supported a proposal to ban gun stores within 5 miles of any school or park (which would eliminate almost every gun store in America).

Voted to allow reckless lawsuits designed to bankrupt the firearms industry.

Called for a 500 percent increase in the federal excise tax on firearms and ammo.

Favors a ban on standard capacity magazines.

Supports mandatory firearms training requirements for all gun owners and a ban on gun ownership for persons under age 21.

Would restore voting rights for 5 million criminals, including those who have been convicted of using a gun to commit a violent crime.

Obama has bodyguards with handguns for his personal protection, but his voting record shows he does not think you should have a handgun for your protection.

Obama: “I am consistently on record and will continue to be on record as opposing concealed carry.” (Chicago Tribune, April 27, 2004).”

Written by Dennis Frank, Libby

I don’t know about you folks, but I for one am worried! What do you think?

—————-

For an in-depth look at what makes Obama tick, I suggest you read this.

Why Obama Scares The Crap Out Of Me