What Obama’s Budget Reveals

4 02 2010
Another well-earned h/t goes out to FS for passing this along.
Here’s the perfect companion piece to the news today that Congress approved another TWO TRILLION DOLLARS to be added to our debt ceiling. I am now totally convinced that Obama and his gang of thugs in Congress are trying to destroy the United States. Something must be done to wake up the average American citizen, cause without their help, we are completely screwed!

What the Obama Budget Reveals

By Jeffrey Folks

// //

Obama’s fiscal 2011 budget, totaling $3.834 trillion, provides more than just details about revenues, expenditures, and deficits. It offers the clearest road map yet as to where the president intends to lead America. What that road map reveals is not very reassuring to those who care about limited government.


The most striking fact about the 2011 budget is its sheer size. A budget of $3.834 trillion is over $12,500 for every human being, or $50,000 per family, in the country. This level of spending is nearly equal to all of the wages collected by American workers in 2010. These numbers prove that the federal government has become a monstrous beast feeding off the lives of the citizenry.


The 2011 budget also reveals Obama’s thorough disdain for free-market capitalism. Given free rein, the Democratic administration would seize the profits of all public and private corporations, effectively nationalizing the economy in the way that Chávez has done in Venezuela. The 2011 budget actually goes a long way in this direction. Other than huge tax increases on individuals resulting from expiration of the Bush tax cuts, the largest increases in the Obama budget come from so-called reform of taxation on American corporations operating overseas. This, of course, includes nearly all large corporations. The annual tax increase would be $13.6 billion for this measure alone.


The administration freely admits that its proposed tax increases are “targeted.” What it refuses to discuss is its rationale for deciding which groups or industries are to be hit with higher taxes and which are to see their taxes lowered. 


An analysis of the proposed changes reveals their cunning and deceptive nature. As Obama has so often repeated, he proposes to limit tax increases on those earning more than $200,000 a year, though this does not rule out indirect taxation via new taxes and fees on goods and services, such as a “transaction tax” on investments. For those in upper brackets, marginal rates would increase by about 15% to 39.6%; capital gains, interest, and dividends would be taxed at a 20% rate rather than 15%; and deductions for home mortgage interest, charitable donations, and other itemized deductions would be reduced to 28%. This, however, is just the beginning. Obama would reinstate the death tax, seizing 45% of estates over $3.5 million. Obama’s proposed tax increases average out to $200 billion per year for the foreseeable future, and these increases do not even address Social Security and Medicare.


So much for the upper-middle class. The middle class, for whom Obama claims to be constantly “fighting,” won’t find much to like in this budget, either.

Obama is a big seller in China. This pic was taken in a Communist Chine Bookstore.

So for whom was this deficit-rich budget concocted? Clearly, it was for those special-interest groups and lobbyists who supported Obama in the 2008 election. The wealth-envy crowd will applaud the $10-billion annual bank “responsibility fee.” The environmental lobby will approve the $4 billion annual tax increase on oil and gas companies. Teachers’ unions will appreciate the 9% increase in education funding. Low-income voters will enjoy the increase in child and earned income credits, along with extensions in unemployment benefits and an additional $100 billion in government make-work spending.

Unfortunately for the underclass and everyone else, the proposed new taxes and deficit spending increases will be passed along in the form of higher prices. If approved in anything like its current form, the 2011 budget will have increased federal spending by 30% over the 2008 figure. Obama would have us believe that this money will come right out of the pockets of “the rich.” Some of it undoubtedly will, but the bulk of this spending is funded by tax increases on corporations and increases in the national debt. The cost of these tax increases will be passed down to everyone.


Obama’s budgetary road map calls on spending $100 billion for new job creation, but the only significant jobs Obama has created so far are those in Washington. If $787 billion created only 65,000 jobs, how many will be created by another $100 billion? And how long will any of these make-work government jobs last? Even if Obama’s massive spending were to create 100,000 jobs, what kind of jobs would these be? So far, most have been jobs within the federal bureaucracy. And what is it, exactly, that public-sector jobs produce? Lots more regulation, for one thing, and the result is a reduction of private-sector jobs that actually produce something of value.


The 2011 budget reveals just how little Obama knows about the private sector. Does the president actually believe that productive jobs can be created by federal diktat out of thin air? Obama’s budget points to a dismal future in which half of the country subsists on welfare while the other half receives a paycheck for processing welfare claims in the federal bureaucracy.


Above all, the 2011 budget reveals just how reckless Obama has become. With its projected annual deficits of well over a trillion dollars, the current administration is risking a future economic meltdown for the sake of securing its own political power. Despite duplicitous talk of belt-tightening, Obama has rejected the prudent course of large spending cuts. Obama’s road map points to a future in which America is overwhelmed by debt. At that point, the middle class will be working overtime just to pay interest on the national debt. None of the president’s special interest groups will be faring so well, either.


Dr. Jeffrey Folks taught for thirty years in universities in Europe, America, and Japan. He has published many books and articles on American culture and politics.



10 responses

4 02 2010

But, but he INHERITED this mess!!!!

the current administration is risking a future economic meltdown for the sake of securing its own political power. Their political power is going to be over in 11/10 and 2012 with this kind of out of control spending – and we’ll still be in an economic meltdown thanks to The Traitor.

4 02 2010

Yep, no matter what the political landscape of 2012 we will be stuck with dragging this heavy financial yoke around with us for the rest of our lives.
The very same goes for our children and of course their children!

Obama is either the sneakiest bastard to ever get into American politics, or the most dangerous.


5 02 2010

I hate to sound alarmist here, but if this goober-cheese isn’t driven from office long before his term expires, what we know as America will most likely not survive.

Obama must be impeached.


There, I said it.


5 02 2010

Aha, I called for his impeachment about a month ago. Gotcha!


5 02 2010




5 02 2010
Bob A

Signed the petition back in December.


5 02 2010
Doc's Wife

It needs to happen SOON!!!

6 02 2010

Thanks, Bob.


6 02 2010
Bob A

You’re Welcome, Dave.

5 02 2010
Ron Sturgeon

So Obama is going to free up the loans to small businesses?
The Banking System Doesn’t Need More Money

As a small business owner with a lot of friends who also own small businesses, I get tired of hearing all the news stories about how small business lending is going to get a shot in the arm from President Obama’s programs or any other source in the foreseeable future. Yesterday I listened to a speaker from one of the large banks talk about how many loans the bank was making, doing its share to get the country moving again. All the banks are simply not making business loans unless they are absolutely gold-plated. Period. This isn’t because they don’t want to make loans; it’s because they’re being criticized by examiners.

The regulators have made it clear to banks that they will be criticized for any loan where the borrower takes out any cash, regardless of the underlying fundamentals or collateral. This is nonsensical.

I understand that real estate is depressed, and that values are uncertain, and that tenants are moving, and all the other fundamentals.

The answer is simple: The regulators need to relax—not on every loan, but use some common sense!

I feel for all the small businesses in America that are crippled. They dont understand why their debt free building isnt worth anything for collateral on a loan, or why their receivables which have deteriorated only slightly are now not worth anything as collateral.

Here’s the simple truth from one of the “little guys” in a small business who sees the misery here in the street, and just can’t relate to our government’s plan to put more money in the system. There is plenty of money out there; someone just needs to stop sitting on it, after the regulators tell them it’s ok to lend some with solid underwriting policies.

This story has been truncated, see the whole story at: http://www.mrmissionpossible.com/blog/auto-salvage-consulting/obamas-30-billion-small-business-plan-more-money-isnt-needed/

Ron Sturgeon
5940 Eden
Ft. Worth TX 76117

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: