Does Bob Herbert Man-Up

26 01 2010

A pure leftist writing for the NYT’s seems to be unraveling as Obama prepares to address the country on Wednesday night. Bob Herbert has always been a lefty you could count on to tow the line for liberal Democrats, but as the following article shows, he may have finally have given up on them.

Things are getting better every day for Conservatives. Enjoy!

Gio-

Who is Barack Obama?

Americans are still looking for the answer, and if they don’t get it soon — or if they don’t like the answer — the president’s current political problems will look like a walk in the park.

Mr. Obama may be personally very appealing, but he has positioned himself all over the political map: the anti-Iraq war candidate who escalated the war in Afghanistan; the opponent of health insurance mandates who made a mandate to buy insurance the centerpiece of his plan; the president who stocked his administration with Wall Street insiders and went to the mat for the banks and big corporations, but who is now trying to present himself as a born-again populist.

Mr. Obama is in danger of being perceived as someone whose rhetoric, however skillful, cannot always be trusted. He is creating a credibility gap for himself, and if it widens much more he won’t be able to close it.

Mr. Obama’s campaign mantra was “change” and most of his supporters took that to mean that he would change the way business was done in Washington and that he would reverse the disastrous economic policies that favored mega-corporations and the very wealthy at the expense of the middle class and the poor.

“Tonight, more Americans are out of work, and more are working harder for less,” said Mr. Obama in his acceptance speech at the Democratic National Convention in August 2008. “More of you have lost your homes and even more are watching your home values plummet. More of you have cars you can’t afford to drive, credit card bills you can’t afford to pay, and tuition that’s beyond your reach.”

Voters watching the straight-arrow candidate delivering that speech, in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Depression, would not logically have thought that an obsessive focus on health insurance would trump job creation as the top domestic priority of an Obama administration.

But that’s what happened. Moreover, questions were raised about Mr. Obama’s candor when he spoke about health care. In his acceptance speech, for example, candidate Obama took a verbal shot at John McCain, sharply criticizing him for offering “a health care plan that would actually tax people’s benefits.”

Now Mr. Obama favors a plan that would tax at least some people’s benefits. Mr. Obama also repeatedly said that policyholders who were pleased with their plans and happy with their doctors would be able to keep both under his reform proposals.

Well, that wasn’t necessarily so, as the president eventually acknowledged. There would undoubtedly be changes in some people’s coverage as a result of “reform,” and some of those changes would be substantial. At a forum sponsored by ABC News last summer, Mr. Obama backed off of his frequent promise that no changes would occur, saying only that “if you are happy with your plan, and if you are happy with your doctor, we don’t want you to have to change.”

These less-than-candid instances are emblematic of much bigger problems. Mr. Obama promised during the campaign that he would be a different kind of president, one who would preside over a more open, more high-minded administration that would be far more in touch with the economic needs of ordinary working Americans. But no sooner was he elected than he put together an economic team that would protect, above all, the interests of Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry, the health insurance companies, and so on.

How can you look out for the interests of working people with Tim Geithner whispering in one ear and Larry Summers in the other?

Now with his poll numbers down and the Democrats’ filibuster-proof margin in the Senate about to vanish, Mr. Obama is trying again to position himself as a champion of the middle class. Suddenly, with the public appalled at the scandalous way the health care legislation was put together, and with Democrats facing a possible debacle in the fall, Mr. Obama is back in campaign mode. Every other utterance is about “fighting” for the middle class, “fighting” for jobs, “fighting” against the big bad banks.

The president who has been aloof and remote and a pushover for the health insurance and pharmaceutical industries, who has been locked in the troubling embrace of the Geithners and Summers and Ben Bernankes of the world, all of a sudden is a man of the people. But even as he is promising to fight for jobs, a very expensive proposition, he’s proposing a spending freeze that can only hurt job-creating efforts.

Mr. Obama will deliver his State of the Union address Wednesday night. The word is that he will offer some small bore assistance to the middle class. But more important than the content of this speech will be whether the president really means what he says. Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation.

They want to know who their president really is.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

9 responses

26 01 2010
velenda

Can not wait for the HOPE AND CHANGE he is sure to speak of in Wednesday’s address to the Nation… Wonder how much more it will cost us? Will there be Q&A at the end of the speach and if he bashes the banks and AIG, will anyone ask about Freddie and Fannie and the unlimited credit it has not to mention all the bonuses give to the heads of THOSE companies? Will we ever find out why this company gets to continue to run ramped with tax-payers dollars? Will we find out if Acorn will get more tax dollars to fraud the next election? Will we find out how he plans on creating more jobs from small business? Or will he just blow smoke up our asses as he has the last year?

26 01 2010
giovanniworld

Something tells me that our asses are going to smell like smoke for quite some time!

Gio-

26 01 2010
velenda

oh ya think, lol

26 01 2010
WingletDriver

“Mr. Obama may be personally very appealing . . . .” Uh, right Mr. Herbert. He may be appealing to you and the other Manhattan snobs.
“Mr. Obama is in danger of being perceived as someone whose rhetoric, however skillful, cannot always be trusted.” In danger of being thought a liar? The danger has passed and reality has set in.
“Now with his poll numbers down and the Democrats’ filibuster-proof margin in the Senate about to vanish. . . .” It’s already gone. Way to keep up with current events. I’m sure even the NYT had an article about the Mass. election.
“But even as he is promising to fight for jobs, a very expensive proposition, he’s proposing a spending freeze that can only hurt job-creating efforts.” Mr Herbert thinks that jobs only come from the government. Isn’t that special?
“The word is that he will offer some small bore assistance to the middle class.” IOW, let them eat cake.
“Americans want to know what he stands for, where his line in the sand is, what he’ll really fight for, and where he wants to lead this nation.” Americans have figured it out even if Bob Herbert hasn’t. He stands for Barack Obama, socialism and abortion, the three things he hasn’t compromised on.

26 01 2010
giovanniworld

Keep up with current events? I understand he can’t get past ESPN on the TV.
Sports are fine, but you can see the problem.

Gio-

28 01 2010
GB

What, specifically, does Mr. Herbert say that identifies him as a leftist? It surely can’t be only that he writes for the New York Times…that was the longtime home for William Safire, and now includes Ross Douthat’s column along with David Brooks. Surely these men cannot be identified with the Democratic Party. So what precisely makes Mr. Herbert a leftist? Are there definable criteria?

28 01 2010
DCG

Given the amount of articles he has posted on HuffPo, that’s all I need to know that he is a lib. Especially when he says, “Mr. Obama is emerging as the very model of the type of person one would want in high public office. He is intelligent, mature, thoughtful, calm in the face of crises and, if the nation is lucky, maybe even wise.” Guess we aren’t so lucky…

29 01 2010
giovanniworld

DCG,

Eeeeeeeewwww, that’s some sappy stuff he wrote!

Gio-

29 01 2010
GB

DCG,

It sounds like you’ve identified an action that “liberals” do, namely, post things on the Huffington Post. I don’t post things there or on any other sites, so does that mean I can safely believe I’m not a liberal. Or alternatively, since I read the Wall Street Journal and I have posted things on this “conservative” site, does that mean I’m conservative?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




%d bloggers like this: