Military Coup in America?

14 10 2009

Commander in chief

Below is the blog Newsmax doesn’t want you to see.

Sometime in late September 2009, John Perry, who blogs for Newsmax, wrote an article describing a possible military coup d’etat scenario in the United States. When “readers complained,” Newsmax removed Perry’s essay.

Newsmax writes on September 29 the following disclaimer:

In a blog posting to Newsmax, John Perry wrote about a coup scenario involving the U.S. military. He clearly stated that he was not advocating such a scenario but simply describing one.

After several reader complaints, Newsmax wanted to ensure that this article was not misinterpreted. It was removed a short time after being posted.

Newsmax strongly believes in the principles of Constitutional government and would never advocate or insinuate any suggestion of an activity that would undermine our democracy or democratic institutions.

Mr. Perry served as a political appointee in the Carter administration in HUD and FEMA. He has no official relationship with Newsmax other than as an unpaid blogger.

Here’s Perry’s original essay!



Obama Risks a Domestic Military Intervention

By: John L. Perry

There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America’s military will intervene as a last resort to resolve the “Obama problem.” Don’t dismiss it as unrealistic.

America isn’t the Third World. If a military coup does occur here it will be civilized. That it has never happened doesn’t mean it won’t. Describing what may be afoot is not to advocate it. So, view the following through military eyes:

Officers swear to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” Unlike enlisted personnel, they do not swear to “obey the orders of the president of the United States.”

  • Top military officers can see the Constitution they are sworn to defend being trampled as American institutions and enterprises arenationalized.
  • They can see that Americans are increasingly alarmed that this nation, under President Barack Obama, may not even be recognizable as America by the 2012 election, in which he will surely seek continuation in office.
  • They can see that the economy — ravaged by deficits, taxes,unemployment, and impending inflation — is financially reliant onforeign lender governments.
  • They can see this president waging undeclared war on the intelligence community, without whose rigorous and independent functions the armed services are rendered blind in an ever-more hostile world overseas and at home.
  • They can see the dismantling of defenses against missiles targeted at this nation by avowed enemies, even as America’s troop strength is allowed to sag.
  • They can see the horror of major warfare erupting simultaneously intwo, and possibly three, far-flung theaters before America can react in time.
  • They can see the nation’s safety and their own military establishments and honor placed in jeopardy as never before.

So, if you are one of those observant military professionals, what do you do?

Wait until this president bungles into losing the war in Afghanistan, and Pakistan’s arsenal of nuclear bombs falls into the hands of militant Islam?

Wait until Israel is forced to launch air strikes on Iran’s nuclear-bomb plants, and the Middle East explodes, destabilizing or subjugating the Free World?

What happens if the generals Obama sent to win the Afghan war are told by this president (who now says, “I’m not interested in victory”) that they will be denied troops they must have to win? Do they follow orders they cannot carry out, consistent with their oath of duty? Do they resign en masse?

Or do they soldier on, hoping the 2010 congressional elections will reverse the situation? Do they dare gamble the national survival on such political whims?

Anyone who imagines that those thoughts are not weighing heavily on the intellect and conscience of America’s military leadership is lost in a fool’s fog.

Will the day come when patriotic general and flag officers sit down with the president, or with those who control him, and work out the national equivalent of a “family intervention,” with some form of limited, shared responsibility?

Imagine a bloodless coup to restore and defend the Constitution through an interim administration that would do the serious business of governing and defending the nation. Skilled, military-trained, nation-builders would replace accountability-challenged, radical-left commissars. Having bonded with his twin teleprompters, the president would be detailed for ceremonial speech-making.

Military intervention is what Obama’s exponentially accelerating agenda for “fundamental change” toward a Marxist state is inviting upon America. A coup is not an ideal option, but Obama’s radical ideal is not acceptable or reversible.

Unthinkable? Then think up an alternative, non-violent solution to the Obama problem. Just don’t shrug and say, “We can always worry about that later.”

In the 2008 election, that was the wistful, self-indulgent, indifferent reliance on abnegation of personal responsibility that has sunk the nation into this morass.




10 responses

15 10 2009

I’ve said a few time’s the day will come when the Joint Chiefs May come knocking at the bamsters door and say your done…………

15 10 2009
Doc's Wife

Scary stuff–could it happen here? Just minutes ago, Fox Morning reported that some are calling on Biden to resign (won’t happen) because of his feeling about Afghanistan.

15 10 2009

Hey Doc’s Wife, that came from Arrianna Huffington Yesterday…LOL It was the lead Story….I get a daily brief in my in Box……just to see what the enemy is up to. They are devouring their own………….Implosions are fun to watch…. 😉

15 10 2009
Tom in NC

Obama needs to seriously watch his hind quarters, military leaders are only going to take so much of his incompetence and destablilization of our defenses.

As far as a coup is concerned, yes I would prefer a bloodless coup where Obama comes to his senses and realizes that him and comrades can no longer ignore the will of the people, which I seriously doubt.

Or we can do it the hard way and the tanks, troops and millions of armed civilians can march up Pennsylvania Avenue and “FORCE” Obama, Pelosi, Reid and all their minions to listen to and abide by will of the people.

Either way, we win, the liberals will finally see us as a force to be reckoned with and will think twice before they ever try this socialism/communism/fascism crap ever again.

15 10 2009

Tom………………or we could do it that way too… prob…. 😉

15 10 2009
Tom in NC

Either way is fine with me, but to tell the truth, I’m itching for a fight, I’ve had my fill many times over of the liberals using the Constitution as their toilet paper and I’m ready, willing and able to take back this country from these bastards any way possible.

15 10 2009

Tom.I hadn’t noticed………LOL………don’t know if you caught a couple of my rants recently, but that would give ya a good Idea I’ve kinda developed a real bad itchy propblem…. 😉

15 10 2009

I have always hoped this guys info on the country has been on a need to know basis and someone with a brain still holds the keys and uses them soon to clean up before it gets worse

29 05 2010

I’m not sure if you are aware of this, but there’s this little thing called the”Commerce Clause” that pretty much authorizes congress to regulate anything that directly or indirectly relates to interstate commerce.
As you are adamant about protecting the constitution, I assume you will from now on find no such outrage against governmental regulations of things related to interstate commerce.
Case closed.

29 05 2010

Since when has this Congress been concerned about following the Constitution?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: