This satire is no different than the Certificate-Of-Live-Birth that Obama and his supporters peddle as proof of his birth eligibility. Neither gives the names of the hospital & the attending physician.
Last week, CNN’s president, Jon Klein, declared that Obama’s birth certificate is “a dead issue” because the original paper document no longer exists, having been destroyed by the Hawaii state government 8 years ago when the government went totally electronic.
At the time, along with others on the Internet, Giovanni’s World pointed out that what Klein asserted contradicts a press release last October by Hawaii’s health officials who said they had “personally” seen Obama’s original birth certificate. How could they if the document had been trashed 7 years ago?
In other words, both Klein and the Hawaii officials cannot be right. One of them either is mistaken or outright lied.
The Hawaii state government now says that what Klein asserted is untrue: When the government went electronic 8 years ago, it did not destroy paper documents, including Obama’s presumed birth certificate. At the same time, Hawaii still refuses to make public the now mythic birth certificate.
And…to think liberals and even some alleged conservatives mock those of us who want the truth by portraying us as wacko “birthers.” Here’s the latest example, by a supposed “conservative” columnist.
Experts on the nature of evil warn that evil’s distinguishing attributes include subtlety, deception, and the confusion it engenders. We have all three in the Case of the Mysterious Birth Certificate.
In contrast, goodness is simple and transparent because the good has nothing to hide.
H/t crystalline GiovanniWorld member Steve!
~Eowyn
…………………………………..
CNN wrong once again – birth record not destroyed
July 27, 2009 - By Jerome R. Corsi
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105233
Directly contradicting CNN chief Jon Klein – who ordered host Lou Dobbs to quit discussing President Obama’s birth certificate – the Hawaii Department of Health affirmed that no paper birth certificates were destroyed when the department moved to electronic record-keeping.
“I am not aware of any birth certificate records that have been destroyed by the department,” Janice Okubo, public information officer for the Hawaii DOH, told WND. “When the department went electronic in 2001, vital records, whether in paper form or any other form, [were] maintained. We don’t destroy records.”
Okubo affirmed that beginning in 2001, all vital records, including birth records, moved to electronic formats.
“Any records that we had in paper or any other form before 2001 are still in file within the department,” she insisted. “We have not destroyed any vital statistics records that we have.”
Last Thursday, Klein, CNN’s U.S. president, told staffers of “Lou Dobbs Tonight” the issue of Obama’s birth certificate and his eligibility to be president is a “dead” story.
According to MediaBistro.com, Klein wrote in an e-mail that CNN researchers found Hawaiian records were discarded in 2001 when the state’s records system went electronic. Therefore, Klein said, Obama’s original long-form birth certificate no longer exists. A computer-generated abbreviated version that has been promoted on the Internet is the official record, he said.
“It seems to definitively answer the question,” Klein wrote. “Since the show’s mission is for Lou to be the explainer and enlightener, he should be sure to cite this during your segment tonite. And then it seems this story is dead – because anyone who still is not convinced doesn’t really have a legitimate beef.”
Hawaii’s Okubu refused to say whether the DOH has Obama’s original long-form birth certificate, explaining state law prohibited her from commenting on the birth records of any specific person.
Okubu’s refusal to comment on the status of Obama’s long-form birth certificate seemed to contradict an Oct. 31, 2008, letter by Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of health for the state of Hawaii. Fukino claimed she personally saw and could verify that Hawaii had Obama’s original long-form birth certificate on file.
But both Okubu and Fukino are now on the record contradicting CNN’s claim that Hawaii had destroyed Obama’s long-form birth certificate when the health department went electronic in 2001.
The White House has refused to acknowledge repeated requests from WND that Obama authorize the Hawaii DOH to release all his birth records, including his original long-form birth certificate.
WND also has reported Obama has not released his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records.
WND also has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
In addition, the question over Obama’s eligibility is being raised on billboards nationwide.
The billboard campaign follows an ongoing petition campaign launched several months ago by WND Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah.
Here’s Obama’s dilemma in a nutshell (READ VERY CAREFULLY AND DIGEST):
If BHO shows his original long form birth certificate, indeed showing he was born in Hawaii, it will also show his father was American citizen, Frank Marshall Davis, not the Kenyan/British citizen, Barack Obama Sr. While that would allow Barack Jr. to be POTUS eligible as BOTH a “citizen”/“native born citizen” AND an Article 2 “natural born citizen” — that is, born to two American citizens on American soil — it would simultaneously show he is a fraud hiding his real father — an unacceptable political debacle.
If, on the other hand, BHO keeps hiding his original long form birth certificate — while simply repeating, without showing, he was born in Hawaii — he can still CLAIM BOTH he was born in Hawaii AND his father was the Kenyan/British Barack Obama Sr. This would enable Barack Jr. to claim he’s a “citizen”/“native born citizen” but it would mean (if a federal court would ever get around to declaring and thus far no one has standing to bring the suit) that he’s NOT an Article 2 “natural born citizen” and thus not eligible to be POTUS — a legal/constitutional debacle since all acts under an illegal POTUS are void.
So it seems, BHO has elected option one until forced to go option two because for now it looks like no federal court will ever find a plaintiff with standing. (Of course, there’s the additional issue of BHO losing American citizen status if/when he became an Indonesian citizen — that is, IF he returned and was naturalized he would be a legal citizen, but would lose both native and natural born status, and, IF he returned and was not naturalized, he would be an illegal immigrant unlawfully in this country — but we’ll leave that for another day.)
Jack,
What evidence do you have that Frank Marshall Davis was BHO’s biological father, instead of the Kenyan BHO Sr.? Did you make it up? Without evidence or a credible source, your assertion is the kind of speculation that leads liberals to dismiss conservatives as unhinged “birthers.” You are harming, not helping, the cause for truth.
I don’t have the slightest idea who BHO’s biological father is, other than that he’s of African descent because BHO’s mother was “white” but BHO has a bi-racial physiognomy. In other words, his physical appearance or phenotype points to his genetic inheritance or genotype.
Nor do I know what his birthplace was, or if he had once renounced his U.S. citizenship for Indonesian, or just why he continues to refuse to divulge his original longform birth certificate, as well as a whole spate of other documents, including his transcripts from Occidental College, Columbia U., and Harvard Law School. For me to say otherwise — that I actually know the answers to these questions — is presumptious, foolish, and ludicrous.
I just want the truth.