Obama Warning

25 06 2009

Just wanted my readers to stay on top of what’s happening.

securedownload1Earlier today there was a short piece going around the net making claims that the “Illegal Immigration” issue had been taken off the table until next year.

Please, I know how easy it could be to just say “phew, we dodged that bullet for awhile”, so make time to tell everyone on your emailing list to NOT believe any reports that the immigration issue has been shelved. As far as everyone is concerned Obama is still pushing amnesty for over 12 million Illegals.

The only time it can be believed is 11:59 PM on New Years Eve!

Gio-

 

 

Stand up and tell the world that you are NOT a racist, stand-up and take the pledge.





Mark Sanford & Profound Tom

25 06 2009

This may be one my stranger postings, then again it may not. This is a twofer posting. You’ll see.

Eating_Crow_edited

When the news broke that the Governor of SC had gone missing, I knew instinctively that either a bad joke had been played, or the media had been played. Then the story changed. The second version had me taking the ball of my hand and hitting myself in the forehead while saying “is that what everyone is upset about”? I just couldn’t get over the media being upset over a Governor wanting to go hiking by himself, it simply seemed petty.

As the day wore on, I read all manner of articles and listened to all manner of pundits on TV. The questions and the comments being made, especially by the Dems, were not making any sense to the trained eye and ear of a political junky like myself. One of the comments even made me roll my eyes. Remember when someone brought this up… “Why would he secretly go hiking on the Appalachian trail, on Fathers Day, and on National Hike Nude day”? The following day I woke to even more news concerning the SC Gov. Speculation was more like it, News is usually considered somewhat accurate. By the end of that day I had had enough, it was time for me to speak out (like anyone cares what I say). And, I had the foresight and stupidity to post my displeasure at http://giovanniworld.wordpress.com/2009/06/23/7720/. Smart move right? Huh, we all know how that turned out! Now I feel like Tom, one of our more recent posters(see Profound Tom below).

The next time something like this comes up I’m going to listen to that little angel in my head that warns me not to step in doo-doo. In the meantime you will find me off by myself somewhere eating a good heaping of Crow!!!

Profound Tom

Tom has only been a poster here at Giovanni’s World for a short time, but in the short time he has been here, he has added to the collective intelligence quotient of this site by a few more points. This profound statement below by Tom puts into perspective how many of us are feeling right now. Two thumbs-up!

“Thanks a lot guys, you have successfully taken the spotlight off of obama’s train wreck of socialism and put it on the fact that you can’t keep your johnson in your pants!”

By Tom

The next time we have the opposition on the ropes, we need to find a way to keep the Republicans from throwing in the towel.

Gio-





Obama, Hypocrite

25 06 2009

Conservatives already know that liberals are rank hypocrites. To name a few examples:

They say they’re tolerant and pro-diversity. But it turns out their “tolerance”  is only for the like-minded and the “diversity” they favor does not extend to ideological or thought diversity.

They say they’re feminist. But the women they champion are only liberal women. Conservative women, no matter how high achieving, instead are targets of their vicious attacks.

They say they’re compassionate toward the poor and needy. But it turns out liberals give much less of their own money to charity than conservatives.

So, it shouldn’t surprise us that their leader, King Hussein Obama, is a hypocrite on the national Big Govt health care plan.

You see, in their black hearts, liberals are elitist. They believe they are smarter, more enlightened, and all-around better than common folks like you and me. Their utopian Big Govt programs are for the little people, not the illumined elite!

~Eowyn

………….

Obama smoking cigaretteEXCLUSIVE: President Obama Defends Right to Choose Best Care

By Jake Tapper and Karen Travers
June 24, 2009

President Obama struggled to explain today whether his health care reform proposals would force normal Americans to make sacrifices that wealthier, more powerful people — like the president himself — wouldn’t face.

The probing questions came from two skeptical neurologists during ABC News’ special on health care reform, “Questions for the President: Prescription for America,” anchored from the White House by Diane Sawyer and Charles Gibson.

Dr. Orrin Devinsky, a neurologist and researcher at the New York University Langone Medical Center, said that elites often propose health care solutions that limit options for the general public, secure in the knowledge that if they or their loves ones get sick, they will be able to afford the best care available, even if it’s not provided by insurance.

Devinsky asked the president pointedly if he would be willing to promise that he wouldn’t seek such extraordinary help for his wife or daughters if they became sick and the public plan he’s proposing limited the tests or treatment they can get.

The president refused to make such a pledge, though he allowed that if “it’s my family member, if it’s my wife, if it’s my children, if it’s my grandmother, I always want them to get the very best care.

“There’s a whole bunch of care that’s being provided that every study, that every bit of evidence that we have indicates may not be making us healthier,” he said.

Gibson interjected that often patients don’t know what will work until they get every test they can.

“Oftentimes we know what makes sense and what doesn’t,” the president responded, making a push for evidence-based medicine.

 

 

Stand up and tell the world that you are NOT a racist, stand-up and take the pledge.





Amerika Babylon

25 06 2009
Scene from New York's "Folsom East" gay sex block party. The two men were naked, except for boots and gloves.

Scene from New York's "Folsom East" gay sex block party. The two men were naked, except for boots and gloves.

Warning: Some readers may find the pic above and the article below objectionable.

~Eowyn

…………….

‘Folsom’ sex-fest moves into NYC

‘Hundreds walked around naked, engaged in public lewdness’

June 25, 2009 – By Bob UnruhWorldNetDaily

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=102098

A “copycat” of San Francisco’s infamous “Folsom Street Festival” homosexual event that features nudity and public sex acts has been held in New York City, apparently in violation of state public decency and exposure laws, according to an activist organization.

The report on Sunday’s “Folsom East” event, dubbed “New York‘s premiere SM-leather-fetish block party” and held on West 28th Street between 10th and 11th avenues, was compiled by sources for Americans for Truth About Homosexuality.

Organization chief Peter LaBarbera said undercover sources said hundreds of men were walking around fully or partly nude, and even a sadistic homosexual “electro-torture” exhibition was featured.

Folsom Gay Festival2In the “public perversion” LaBarbera reported, a homosexual used a remote control device to deliver an electric charge to the sex organs of another man.

WND has reported several times on the San Francisco event, including weeks ago when promoters revealed this year’s poster, making fun of the traditional family.

The organizers for the X-rated Folsom Street Fair have produced a poster to promote this year’s event that features half a dozen actors and actresses playing the roles of the iconic “nuclear family” photograph from 40 years ago – but dressed in leather, holding fetishes and not quite fully clothed.

“Will House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., denounce this attack on the natural family, or will she continue to pander to her homosexual base – as she did by refusing to condemn a version of the above that blasphemed the Last Supper?” asked LaBarbera at the time.

“Few Americans have any clue about just how deviant America’s Queer Mecca is,” he said.

LaBarbera said the Folsom East undercover source reported police were around the perimeter of the event but not inside. He has posted a full report on his website, but readers are advised of the explicit nature of the images.

Robert Peters, president of New York City -based Morality in Media, told AFTAH the activities appeared to violate New York State’s laws against: “Public lewdness (Penal Law, Section 245.00); “Exposure of a person” (Section 245.01); and a “Promoting the exposure of a person” (Section 245.02).

“Tragically, the New York City Police Department turns a blind eye towards violations of these laws during the ‘gay pride’ festivities each year,” Peters told AFTAH.

Separately, a YouTube.com video was posted revealing some of the activities at the New York event, but it cannot be linked because of its explicit nature.

WND reported on last year’s event in San Francisco, when the local Chronicle newspaper documented: “There were naked people selling bondage gear and naked people seeking support for measures on the Nov. 4 ballot. There were naked people with cameras, taking pictures of other naked people. One man wore only an 11-foot Burmese python, which curled around his waist.”

The festival, which celebrates deviant sex, including homosexual activities, has turned in recent years into a daylong showing of nudity and public sex acts with promotions of the unnatural and pornographic – all on the public streets of San Francisco with formal approval of Mayor Gavin Newsom.

“Entry signs to the fair said, ‘Nudity is illegal,’ but thousands of people took advantage of the fact that nudity and decency laws were not enforced by the police,” LaBarbera’s report on last fall’s event said.

Linda Harvey of Mission America described the 2008 event as a “massive pagan pansexual street party, complete with instances of full nudity, homosexuality and crowds gathered around people being whipped for sado-masochistic pleasure.”





Does America Have Amnesia?

25 06 2009
Barney Frank is the one in the middle

Barney Frank is the one in the middle

Here we go again.

Perhaps there are still some Americans left who are not suffering from amnesia. Perhaps there are still a few Americans who remember that the whole mortgage debacle (that ruptured the housing bubble that began the global economic recession/depression) was triggered by the insolvency of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

That, in turn, was due in no small part to Congressman Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), in his capacity as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, relaxing lowering the standards of FM²’s lending. Which resulted in the extension of mortgages to people who simply could not afford the houses they were buying. Which led to foreclosures galore as the grossly inflated home prices began to fall.

Now, Barney Frank — together with his accomplice-in-crime Anthony Weiner (D-New York) — is doing the same thing that got us into this mess in the first place. They are proposing “relaxing” FM²’s lending standards again!

“Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” It’s been often observed that Americans have a short attention span and a woeful tendency toward historical amnesia.

If the American people don’t protest Barney Frank’s latest stunt and Congress goes along with this, America deserves to go down the tubes.

H/t to reliable GiovanniWorld member Steve!

~Eowyn

…………..

Fannie, Freddie asked to relax condo loan rules: report

Mon Jun 22, 2009

http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-Housing/idUSTRE55L39120090622

(Reuters) – Two U.S. Democratic lawmakers want Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to relax recently tightened standards for mortgages on new condominiums, saying they could threaten the viability of some developments and slow the housing-market recovery, the Wall Street Journal said.

In March, Fannie Mae (FNM.N)(FNM.P) said it would no longer guarantee mortgages on condos in buildings where fewer than 70 percent of the units have been sold, up from 51 percent, the paper said. Freddie Mac (FRE.P)(FRE.N) is due to implement similar policies next month, the paper said.

In a letter to the CEO’s of both companies, Representatives Barney Frank, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Anthony Weiner warned that a 70 percent sales threshold “may be too onerous” and could lead condo buyers to shun new developments, according to the paper.

The legislators asked the companies to “make appropriate adjustments” to their underwriting standards for condos, the paper added.

In an interview with the paper, Weiner said the rules have “had a real chill on the ability to get these condos sold,” at a time when prices of condos have fallen enough to attract potential buyers.

In addition to the 70 percent sales threshold, Fannie Mae will also not purchase mortgages in buildings where 15 percent of owners are delinquent on condo association dues or where one owner has more than 10 percent of units, as the firm sees these as signals that a building could run into financial trouble, the paper added.

Both Fannie and Freddie are preparing a response to the lawmakers, according to the paper.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could not be immediately reached for comment by Reuters.

(Reporting by Chakradhar Adusumilli in Bangalore; editing by Simon Jessop)





Kill Cap & Trade

24 06 2009

 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY

1726 M STREET NW – TENTH FLOOR – WASHINGTON, DC 20036 – 866-730-0150 – www.americansforprosperity.org
COPYRIGHT 2008 AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY

 

Dear Giovanni,

The time has finally come for a vote on cap-and-trade, H.R. 2454.  House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has called a vote just before the 4th of July recess, hoping to use the specter of keeping everyone in DC and ruining their holiday, to force cap-and-trade legislation through.
                                                    
I’m not sending this email out to our national list.  You’re only getting it because your Member of Congress is one of the two dozen or so in the whole country that we believe still hasn’t made a final decision. 
 
There may not be time to read emails or faxes, so phone calls are crucial today, tomorrow, and Friday up until the vote.  PLEASE click here and enter your zip code to get your representative’s number and talking points on this issue. 
 
Your emails in the past have been great, but our allies on the Hill have told us that phone calls are the best way to make a difference.
 
 
The Pelosi/Reid/Obama team has been unable to pass cap-and-trade thus far for one simple reason: it’s an enormous tax.  The country is struggling to cope with the current recession but the politicians in power don’t seem to care how this bill will affect your family.
 
President Obama famously said during the campaign “under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.”  But he also pledged not to raise taxes “even one dime” on middle class Americans.  Well it looks like he may be poised to break that promise.
 
We must band together and speak out with one voice in opposition to this egregious tax hike that will have virtually no beneficial impact on the environment.  In fact, the EPA has even admitted that cap-and-trade could increase carbon emissions, as jobs flee the country and the painful regulations this bill will impose.
 
It’s time to kill this tax-hiking, job-killing, freedom-stifling legislation once and for all and your representative’s vote will be crucial on this bill. 
 
 
 




Corporate Rats Abandon Sinking Ship

24 06 2009

rat

What if I tell you that the big executives of America’s business corporations are selling instead of buying their stock shares?

Will you think that these people — who know more about the economy than the hoi polloi such as you and me — have no confidence that our economy will rebound under Hussein Obama?

Well, that’s exactly what’s happening. Not a good sign!

~Eowyn

………….

June 24, 2009

Abandoning a sinking ship?

Rick Moran – http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/06/abandonng_a_sinking_ship.html

US corporation executives certainly aren’t showing much confidence in The One’s ability to bring the economy back.

Anuj Gangahar and Michael Mackenzie of the Financial Times are reporting that many exes are cashing out their shares in anticipation of a continued downturn in the world economy:

Executives in charge of the largest US companies sent a signal of their concerns by selling far more shares than they bought this month, according to data based on Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

Share sales by so-called company insiders are outstripping purchases so far this month by more than 22 times. TrimTabs, the investment research company, said insiders of S&P 500 listed companies have unloaded $2.6bn in shares in June, compared with $120m in purchases.

“The smartest players in the US stock market – the top insiders who run public companies – are not betting their own money on an economic recovery,” said Charles Biderman, chief executive of TrimTabs.


I would say to those rich, white guys have a little faith, brothers! Racking up trillions in deficits and double digit trillions in debt over the next decade can be good for you if you only accept the Word of The One.

Oh ye of little faith, ye shall be proved wrong as the policies of the Messiah bear fruit and dollars multiply like randy rabbits.

Mmmmmm – I don’t think they’re buying, do you?





GOP Is Suicidal

24 06 2009

seppuku

At a time when our country most desperately needs a strong opposition party, the Republican Party is self-destructing before our eyes.

In the space of a week, one Republican politician after another has committed political suicide.

First, Senator John Ensign (R-Nevada) admitted he had an extramarital affair with a member of his staff who herself is married. Questions about how and how much she was paid suggest there may also be financial improprieties on top of the adultery.

Now, it turns out that married South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford’s mysterious 4-day absence (which was most irresponsible of him because no one knew where he was) was to visit his mistress in Argentina!

Both Ensign and Sanford had been well regarded in their party. Both were seen as attractive and likely contenders to be the GOP candidate for the 2012 prez election.

With “leaders” such as these two hypocrites-bozos, who needs enemies?

~Eowyn

…………..

Mark Sanford: I’ve Been Unfaithful

Updated: Wednesday, 24 Jun 2009, 1:23 PM MDT

By JIM DAVENPORT Associated Press Writer

http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/dpp/news/national/dpg_Governor_Mystery_Trip_fc_20090624_2605998

COLUMBIA, S.C. – Gov. Mark Sanford admitted Wednesday he’s been having an affair with a woman he visited on a secret trip to Argentina and said he’ll resign as head of the Republican Governors Association. Sanford, a rumored 2012 presidential candidate, refused to say whether he’ll leave office.

“I’ve let down a lot of people, that’s the bottom line,” Sanford said at a news conference. He said he’s known the woman about eight years, but their relationship turned into something more a year ago while he was on an economic development trip to Argentina.

Sanford, a 49-year-old father of four, choked up during remarks to reporters. He said his wife has known about the affair for the last five months.

Sanford revealed Wednesday morning that he’d gone to Argentina for a seven-day trip. For two days after reporters starting asking questions, his office had said he had gone hiking on the Appalachian Trial.

Meanwhile, first lady Jenny Sanford had told The Associated Press she did not know where her husband went for the Father’s Day weekend.

First elected governor in 2002, the former real estate developer has more than year remaining in his second term and is barred by state law from running again.

A former three-term congressman, Sanford most recently snared headlines for his unsuccessful fight to turn aside federal stimulus cash for his state’s schools. His vocal battle against the Obama administration — and libertarian, small-government leanings — won praise from conservative pundits. Ultimately, a state court order required him to take the money.

Sanford’s announcement came a day after another prominent Republican, Sen. John Ensign of Nevada, apologized to his GOP Senate colleagues after revealing last week that he had an affair with a campaign staffer and was resigning from the GOP leadership.

Sanford was born May 28, 1960, in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., the eldest of four siblings. He earned a bachelor’s degree in business from Furman University in 1983 and a master’s of business administration from the University of Virginia in 1988.

After working for a couple of years in the financial world in New York, he returned to South Carolina and said he was shaped by his summers working on the family plantation. He served in the U.S. House for three terms before honoring a term limits pledge and leaving office in 2001.

In 2002, he defeated incumbent Democrat Jim Hodges by 4 percentage points to become governor and won re-election in 2006, beating Democratic state Sen. Tommy Moore.

As governor, Sanford has had seemingly endless run-ins with the GOP-dominated Legislature, once bringing pigs to the House chamber to protest pork barrel spending. He also put a “spending clock” outside his office to show how quickly a proposed budget would spend state money.





Obama Media Takeover

24 06 2009

Commie statue of liberty

An Obama Media Takeover

By James Hirsen – 6/24/09 – A Newsmax Report

NBC pawns off a White House tour as news.

Former journalists, including Linda Douglas, Jay Carney, and Tom Brokow, are officially on the White House payroll.

ABC provides a valuable prime-time slot so that the Obama administration can air a healthcare informercial.

What’s going on here?

An Obama takeover of the media, that’s what.

Just another industry notch in the president’s belt? Not exactly. This one promises to have a domino effect on civil liberties the likes of which we have never seen.

Why? Because the right of the people to be informed by a free press, i.e., media, is a primary one among our God-given, constitutional rights, along with free religious expression, speech, etc.

And to think that some would relinquish this right so willingly.

Obama wants it all, and he wants it now — the media, that is.

Television networks are his priority because TV is where most folks get their information.

The Fox News Channel has been the lone holdout for the president with its balanced approach, but it pays a price. He avoids granting interview access to Fox, like appearing on CNBC to discuss his new financial regulations but slighting Fox’s Neil Cavuto.

While on CNBC, he’s questioned about his favorable press coverage.

“It’s very hard for me to swallow that one,” Obama says. “First of all, I’ve got one television station entirely devoted to attacking my administration. I mean, you know, that’s a pretty . . . .”

“I assume you’re talking about Fox,” the interviewer says.

“Well, that’s a pretty big megaphone,” the president answers. “And you’d be hard-pressed, if you watched the entire day, to find a positive story about me on that front.”

Totally untrue. And totally unchallenged.

The complete lying down on the job of mainstream networks and most cable news channels isn’t good enough for Obama. He wants bootlicking from every single big media player.

This week as ABC News airs the prime-time special, “Questions for the President: Prescription for America,” in out-and-out brainwashing fashion the American people are denied the whole story.

While every news related show on ABC, from “Good Morning America” to “World News Tonight,” pushes the Obama administration’s trillion-dollar socialized medicine plan, to add to the outrage an advocacy group, Conservatives for Patients Rights, is denied the opportunity to run a 60-second ad.

If there were any question as to whether ABC was avoiding the airing of differing points of view, the network’s refusal to accept the paid advertisement removes all doubt.

In addition, a request from the Republican National Committee was turned down flat by the Disney owned network.

What we as Americans should be screaming at the top of our lungs is we want a free, unbiased, truth-telling media, and we want it now.

If ABC no longer wishes to accept its ethical obligations, some folks think it’s time to boycott the network’s advertisers.

Otherwise the federal government won’t just be selling cars. It’ll be peddling the evening news.

~submitted by Eowyn





Your Taxes Will Explode

24 06 2009

oppression

Please take a couple of minutes to read this — then e-mail it to your friends and family.

~Eowyn

…………………..

Washington’s Plot to Explode Your Taxes

Peter Ferrara – 6.24.09 – http://spectator.org/archives/2009/06/24/washingtons-plot-to-explode-yo

Everyone in Washington knows the record Federal deficits and debt are out of control and can’t continue. President Obama knows it. The ultraliberal Democrat Congressional leadership knows it. Rank and file Congressional Republicans and Democrats know it. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has been openly saying so.

Obama’s economic policies, adopted by the Democrat-controlled Congress, call for total Federal borrowing of $3.5 trillion this year alone! The Federal debt is projected to soar over the next 10 years to a peacetime record of 84% of GDP, and to keep on growing past the all-time record of 113% of GDP during World War II. Rep. Paul Ryan, ranking Republican on the House Budget Committee, projects it will climb to 200% of GDP, twice the size of our entire economy. That would be 5 times the level of national debt that prevailed for decades before Obama.

This is the result of adding Obama’s extreme, liberal left, Keynesian economic plan, with its trillion dollar stimulus package of wasteful spending that will do nothing to stimulate the economy, on top of the exploding costs of our current entitlement programs.

Obama’s New Amerika

But not to worry, because the Congressional Democrat leadership and President Obama have a plan. First they are going to pass national health care, adding the biggest entitlement of all to the fiscal catastrophe we already have, giving new definition to the term fiscal insanity. Then, after that, they are going to come back to us and say, gee, we have no choice now but to raise your taxes, really, really, really raise your taxes, to record-shattering levels, to levels so high that it will change the fundamental nature of our economy and our nation.

After that, America will no longer be a land of prosperity and booming economic growth, as it has been for hundreds of years, since early colonial days. It will no longer enjoy the highest standard of living in the world. It will instead be America the Welfare State, with a government so big and overwhelming that everyone will be scrambling to get their personal gravy in government handouts, rather than producing for the marketplace and consumers.

Example Number 1 of this will be the new Obama health care system, where the doctors and hospitals will all be working for the government, who will be paying their bills, not you the patient, who will just be along for the ride. When the government tells them not to provide medicine for macular degeneration, or cancer treatment for senior citizens because it is not “cost effective,” or referrals to specialists until it is too late, the doctors and hospitals will all hop to and salute, because they will be desperate for their slice of federal funding.

In this new system, everyone — patients, doctors, hospitals, etc. — will all be sacrificed for the “greater good,” as defined by the liberal left. Doctors and surgeons now refusing Medicaid and Medicare patients because the government won’t pay them enough will find the same government is refusing them adequate payment for everyone. Cost pressures will lead the government to clamp down more and more over time on payments to doctors, hospitals, drug companies, and other health providers. They will be vilified in the media just like the bank executives are now in regard to their traditional bonuses. As a result, investment will collapse in new hospital capacity and medical facilities, and development and adoption of new, cutting edge, health technologies and advanced, high tech, miracle drugs, sacrificing the interests of sick patients. This is how Canada got to the point where a hospital room could not be found in British Columbia for a mother experiencing accelerating birth contractions, and she had to be flown over the Rockies to the next state, Alberta, while giving birth, to find maternity care. Human capital will flee the health system as well, as older doctors retire early and new ones choose other professions instead, further constricting care for sick patients.

The Current Entitlement Catastrophe

Adding this new, massive, health care entitlement on top of the enormous entitlement mess we already have could not be more ridiculous and wildly irresponsible. The latest Trustees’ Reports show that the current unfunded liability for Medicare alone is $89 trillion. Social Security adds another $15.1 in unfunded liabilities, for a total of $104 trillion. And that doesn’t even count Medicaid. The entire American economy right now only produces about $14 trillion a year.

Since World War II, going back 60 years, federal spending as a percent of GDP has been stable, hovering around 20%. But the cost of the three big entitlement programs alone, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, is now projected to balloon eventually to 20.5% of GDP. Counting burgeoning interest on the national debt, on our current course federal spending will rocket towards 40% of GDP. Counting state and local spending, total government in America will consume over 50% of GDP. GDP will collapse in the face of all that spending and the resulting taxation and debt, increasing the percentage of government spending further. America will no longer be a free country, at least in terms of the freedom of people to enjoy the fruits of their own labor and decide how to use what they earn for the pursuit of happiness.

This doubling of federal spending as a percent of GDP implies a doubling of federal tax rates. The Heritage Foundation reports that trying to pay all of the promised benefits of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid by raising income taxes would require raising the top 35% tax bracket to 77% and the 25% tax bracket paid by middle income earners to 55%. All income tax brackets, in fact, would have to be doubled.

By 2018, less than 10 years from now, Medicare Part A will be running a deficit of close to $100 billion. General revenue contributions for Medicare Parts B and D that year are now projected to be $364 billion. Consequently, the deficit for Medicare alone that year will be close to $500 billion (and that assumes a scheduled reduction in doctor and hospital reimbursements of over 20% starting in 2010). Yet, Obama and the Left are preparing to fight for an “option” for everyone to join Medicare or its equivalent as the answer to our health care problems. This is their “public option,” which they say will keep insurance companies honest. But who is going to keep the government honest? These people just cannot be numerically literate.

How the Plot Will Work: A Tax Increase for 95% of Americans

After Obama’s socialized medicine plan is passed, the hue and cry will start coming out of Washington, and will be echoed throughout the Democrat Party controlled media, that something has to be done about this fiscal catastrophe. The answer will be to appoint a new federal spending and tax reform commission, which will report back just after next year’s election. America will then be permanently mangled by the enactment of extremist, bone-crushing taxes early in 2011.

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-ND) is a leader of this plot. So is House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) as well as Speaker Nancy Pelosi. So are all the blue dog Democrats, led by Rep. Jim Cooper (D-TN). Unfortunately, so are some strategically inept Republicans and conservative institutions who are thinking now we need to get control of the long-term budget disaster, but are not thinking ahead concerning what such a Commission will mean in the current Washington thoroughly controlled by the liberal/left.

In fact, legislation for just such a Commission has already been introduced in both the House and the Senate, by Reps. Jim Cooper and Frank Wolf (R-VA), and Sens. Kent Conrad, Judd Gregg (R-NH), and George Voinovich (R-OH). The great majority of Commission members will be appointed by President Obama and the current ultraliberal Congressional leadership. It would be modeled on the base closing commission, with only one up or down vote allowed on the Commission’s sweeping recommendations.

One leading conservative institution that favors this bill argues that it expects the Commission to deal with the long-term budget and entitlement crisis entirely by cutting government spending, which is what it favors. But who are they kidding? The liberal/left now in complete control of Washington, not to mention the so-called Mainstream Media, is not going to support cutting the welfare state in half. It is going to use the Commission to figure out how to finance doubling the welfare state, which is what Obama and the Democrat Congress are adopting now. Any such commission is just to provide political cover for massive, runaway tax increases.

Barack Obama won the White House with a campaign pledge to cut taxes for 95% of Americans. But now this plot is under way to increase taxes on 95% of Americans, to record, bone-crunching levels.

The Right Strategy: Congress Do Your Job

America is not Iran, or Russia or China. We are supposed to be governed by the Constitution and democracy, not by a Commission of supposed “experts.” Conservatives should not be involved in this plot to subvert our capitalist economy, our Constitution and our democracy. They should be advocating the legislative reforms and policies that conservatives favor, and demanding that Congress do its job and enact these changes.

This means that Congress must first reject any new health care entitlement. They should focus instead on alternatives that ensure we have a real health care safety net in place so that no one will suffer without essential medical care. That is all that needs to be done, we don’t need a government takeover of health care as the Left wants. Such legislation has already been introduced by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) and Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI), involving no net increase in spending or taxes. Another bill has just been introduced by Sen. Jim DeMint with even less government involved, which is more strongly supported by conservatives.

Secondly, Congress should repeal the badly confused stimulus, and end all further bailouts. Only a small fraction of the trillion-dollar stimulus has been spent so far, and it has not and will not work to stimulate the economy. You don’t restore economic growth by borrowing a trillion dollars out of the economy for the government to spend a trillion dollars. That adds nothing to the economy on net, and does nothing for the fundamental incentives that truly drive economic recovery and growth.

Thirdly, contrary to what most half -baked commentators say, packages of tax increases and benefit cuts are not the only way to reform entitlements. Rather, we should advance fundamental reforms that restructure and modernize our entitlements from the bottom up. Such reforms can serve the goals of our current entitlements even better than our current old-fashioned programs, while costing far less.

For example, in 1996 we reformed the old Depression era Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program by sending it back to the states with the Federal share of funding for the program in finite block grants. The old program provided matching federal funds for each dollar the state spent, so the states kept increasing their welfare rolls in good times and bad, bringing more federal funds to their state as a result. The new system provided that the amount of federal funding was fixed, and if the state spent more that extra money would all come out of its own pocket. But if the state spent less due to reform, it could keep the savings.

With these new incentives and the freedom to remake the program, the states focused on work requirements to reduce the program’s rolls by close to 60% nationwide. Such reform should now be extended to the other 85 federal means-tested welfare programs, including Medicaid. Send them all back to the states under the same rules.

But Obama has done just the opposite, undermining this reform with new rules and welfare benefits adopted in his stimulus bill, which has already caused a reversal sharply increasing the welfare rolls.

Another opportunity is personal savings, insurance and investment accounts for Social Security and even part of Medicare. Workers should each have the freedom to choose to shift first some and then eventually all of their payroll taxes to such accounts, replacing all the benefits currently financed by those payroll taxes through the accounts. This would dramatically reduce federal spending over the long run, and phase out the deficits of Social Security and Medicare. But since over the long run, real market investments provide much better returns than Social Security even promises, let alone what it can pay, retirees would enjoy even higher benefits under such reform.

While our economy has suffered from a severe recession over the last year, such personal account investments are held for the very long term, for the entire adult lifetime of each worker. When we restore free market policies, the economy and investments across the board will boom again. Meanwhile, to ensure the social safety net of current entitlements continues, such reform can and should include a government guarantee that all retirees will get through the accounts at least as much as promised by Social Security. This would be far less than what such accounts would pay at standard, long term, market investment returns. The South American nation of Chile follows this same policy for its thorough personal account system adopted in 1981.

Such reforms are already included in the Ryan Roadmap, already introduced in legislation by Rep. Paul Ryan. That legislation has been officially scored by CBO as completely eliminating all long-term entitlement deficits, without any increase in taxes. Instead, the federal budget is balanced over the long term at 18.5% of GDP, smaller than the current Federal budget. Indeed, the Roadmap includes tax reform as well, with a new system applying a 10% tax rate on families with incomes up to $100,000 per year and singles up to $50,000, and a 25% rate on all incomes above that. Generous personal exemptions provide that a family of four earning up to $48,000 would pay no income tax.

Another round of tea parties is scheduled for July 4. The Washington plot to explode our taxes, and these alternative reforms, would be a good focus for tea party activists.





Climate Change Bill Equals $$$

24 06 2009

smileTo all my fellow Americans… It is time to bend over and kiss your ass goodbye! The second greatest hoax ever played on the American people (the first being Obama) is about to be rammed through Congress. I hope that anyone from the GOP that signs on to this nonsense will burn in hell!

Gio-

h/t to GiovanniWorld member Steve for this one. I’m a real slacker, it took Steve making a comment on an article that he submitted, to shake my memory and give him the hat-tip. Youth is most definitely wasted on the young!!!

Climate Bill Set for Vote After Deal Is Reached

WASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has scheduled a vote Friday on a sprawling climate-change bill, signaling the Democratic leadership’s confidence that it can overcome objections from Farm Belt Democrats.

Opponents and supporters of landmark climate legislation are ramping up their public-relations campaigns ahead of the planned vote. The Obama administration is pushing the measure as a job-creator, while critics, including many Republicans, are portraying the bill as an energy tax that could slow the economy.

[Nancy Pelosi]Nancy Pelosi

The legislation, co-sponsored by House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D., Calif.) and Rep. Edward Markey (D., Mass.), had stalled last week because of opposition from Farm Belt Democrats concerned their states will face heavier costs under the proposed law to curb greenhouse-gas emissions.

Discussions were still continuing Tuesday. Josh Syrjamaki, chief of staff for one of those Democrats, Minnesota Rep. Timothy Walz, said his boss hadn’t yet given his support for the bill because he hadn’t yet seen details of a deal.

Drew Hammill, a spokesman for Ms. Pelosi, said in an email late Monday evening: “There are some issues still under discussion, but we are confident we can resolve them by the time the bill goes to the floor on Friday.”

The bill aims to cap greenhouse-gas emissions at 17% of 2005 levels by 2020 and at roughly 80% by 2050, creating a market for companies to buy and sell the right to emit carbon dioxide and other gases. It also mandates a new renewable electricity standard and establishes new national building codes.

It would mark the first time that either of the two chambers of Congress have voted to impose mandatory reductions in greenhouse-gas emissions — a goal President Barack Obama wants to achieve before a round of international climate talks in December in Copenhagen.

Mr. Obama on Tuesday said the House climate bill is “extraordinarily important for our country,” urging House members “to come together and pass it.” The president said it would create millions of new “green” jobs that can’t be shipped overseas.

Mr. Obama also sent his top cabinet officials, including his Energy, Interior, Transportation and Labor secretaries, around the country to gather public support.





Mexican-Flagburner Called “Terrorist”

24 06 2009

Liberal fascism

Remember that infamous memo from the Dept of HOmeland Security, identifying as “extremists” and “potential terrorists” such groups as Christians, veterans, pro-lifers, pro-gunrights, and those opposed to illegal immigration?

Well, at least one city’s police is taking that memo seriously. A man who burned a Mexican flag in Alamo, Texas, to protest illegal immigration was detained by the authorities, called a “terrorist,” and cited for “illegal burning without a permit.”

Now, if he had burned an American flag instead…..

~Eowyn

………….

Flag-burning man sues city

By Guillermo Contreras – Express-News – Web Posted: 06/22/2009 4:50 CDT

A Hondo man who was cited for burning the Mexican flag in front of the Alamo is suing the city of San Antonio, park rangers and The Daughters of the Republic of Texas over the matter.

David Bohmfalk, 48, claims he burned the flag on May 17, 2007, to protest a Senate bill that would have given amnesty to millions of unauthorized immigrants. The measure did not become law.

His lawsuit, moved Friday to federal court from state court, alleges rangers with the Alamo and the city violated his First Amendment right to free speech.

The suit alleges false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, defamation and intentional infliction of emotional distress. It seeks unspecified compensatory and exemplary damages.

The officers, the suit said, detained Bohmfalk more than an hour and called him a terrorist before deciding to cite him with illegal burning without a permit, a misdemeanor.

Bohmfalk, a disabled veteran and former police chief of Bracketville, tried to get a permit, but the city does not issue permits for flag burning, said his lawyer, Jason Jakob. Jakob also said even though the flag was not an American flag, activity the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled is constitutionally protected free speech, does not matter.

In court-filed responses, lawyers for the city and the Daughters of the Republic of Texas, which operates the Alamo, deny most of the allegations.

The city in October 2007 backed away from collecting a $198 fine from Bohmfalk. Prosecutors dismissed the charge once Bohmfalk made a public plea and the case received national attention.

The suit said that while Bohmfalk was detained by Alamo rangers, city park rangers arrived and began discussing what felony they could charge him with. They called him a “domestic terrorist” and questioned his mental stability, the suit said.

Bohmfalk’s suit said that while detained, he was harassed, his life was threatened by passersby and that some tourists spit on him. No one else was cited or charged, the suit said.

“He has an absolute constitutional right to do this,” Jakob said. “The biggest reason he is (suing) is because the police never should have detained him in the first place ….. He also does not want this to happen to anyone else.”





Another Bone-Headed Obama Move

23 06 2009

Spy Satellite Program Is Eliminated

Published: June 23, 2009

The Obama administration is planning to eliminate a spy satellite program at the Department of Homeland Security that had produced concerns about domestic spying, officials said. The program would have given state and local law enforcement officials access to high-resolution imagery from spy satellites to aid them in disaster relief efforts, bolster border security and help secure major events like the Super Bowl. The program, the National Applications Office, was first proposed two years ago by the Bush administration but had not yet begun operations. Civil libertarians and some influential lawmakers had criticized it. Officials said the homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, ordered a review of the program shortly after she was confirmed. The decision to close the office was first reported by The Associated Press.





Must Do Tonight!

23 06 2009

liberal_crapThanks goes out to GiovanniWorld member Will for forwarding this warning to us. Not much time so send in comments TONIGHT!

Gio-

———————

Hello,

Will G. suggested that you might be interested in learning about the Obama Administration’s proposed regulation to declare that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas and a threat to public health and welfare.

The EPA has proposed harmful new regulations on carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. Intended to fight global warming, these new rules would hurt ordinary Americans, constrain the economy and impose vast quantities of red tape.

The Environmental Protection Agency announced on April 17 that it will have a 60-day comment period for Americans to express their opinions about the government’s economically devastating plan to regulate carbon dioxide. The “Stop EPA” coalition needs your help in informing the agency that enacting these regulations would destroy jobs, hurt businesses, and dramatically affect the lives and day-to-day activities of all Americans, all for an inconsequential change in the Earth’s temperature. Willie just visited www.StopEPA.com and emailed a comment directly to EPA through our website and thought you might too want to get involved. We must urge the government to refrain from enacting environmental regulations that will damage our economy.

 

Please visit StopEPA.com to submit a comment voicing your opposition to regulations on carbon dioxide emissions. The comment period ends June 23, 2009, so we must act now!

Sincerely,

The “Stop EPA” Coalition

 

www.StopEPA.com





Obama’s Inspiration

23 06 2009

One of Obama's favs.

One of Obama's favs.

“We asked for freedom of the press, thought, and civil liberties in the past because we were in the opposition and needed these liberties to conquer. Now that we have conquered, there is no longer any need for such civil liberties.”

     Bukharin, 1917

Nikolai Ivanovich Bukharin

Nikolai Bukharin was born in Moscow, the son of a schoolteacher. As a university student, he became interested in the anticzarist political movement. In 1906 he joined the Leninist faction of the Russian Social Democratic Workers’ party, then known as the Bolsheviks. He worked for the party as a successful propagandist and organizer. In 1911 he emigrated to Germany and remained abroad, either in Europe or the United States, until the Revolution began in 1917. At this time he began to establish himself as a major theorist, writing Political Economy of the Leisure Class (1912-1913) and World Economy and Imperialism (1915). Gradually, a split emerged between the position taken by Lenin and that of Bukharin with respect to the conditions under which revolution would succeed in Russia. Bukharin and others, who came to be known as the Left Bolsheviks, took the view that the coming socialist revolution could be successful only in a European-wide context, with the emergence of a socialist United States of Europe.

In 1917 Bukharin returned to Russia, but in 1918 his left-wing attitudes caused him to part company temporarily with Lenin. In the face of Lenin’s proposal to end World War I for Russia by a separate peace with Germany, Bukharin, Trotsky, Dzerzhinsky, and others argued strongly for changing the world war into a European revolutionary war. But by the time of the Tenth Party Congress (1921), Bukharin’s views had begun to undergo extensive change. He supported Lenin’s proposal to consolidate the victories of the party inside Russia by means of the New Economic Policy. During this period and the remainder of the 1920s, Bukharin held numerous high party and government posts, including the editorships of Pravda (1918-1929), the journal Bolshevik (1924-1929), and the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. In addition, he was chairman of the Communist International (Comintern, 1919-1929) and a member of the Political Bureau (executive committee) of the party’s Central Committee. At the same time he continued his work in Marxist-Leninist political theory, publishing his Theory of Historical Materialism (1921).

After the death of Lenin in 1924, a struggle for power ensued, and the ideological positions as well as the political self-interests of Bukharin and Stalin dictated their cooperation in the defeat of Trotsky, Zinoviev, and Kamenev. Ultimately, however, Bukharin himself fell victim to Stalin’s tactics when he was condemned as a leader of the so-called Right Deviation (1928-1929). As a result, Bukharin was removed from his high positions by mid-1929, though he continued to be a potential threat to Stalin. By 1934 Bukharin had regained a measure of his former power. His position continued to be precarious, however, and he was finally arrested during the Great Purge in 1937. Brought to trial with 20 others, he was accused of plotting the overthrow of the state. Bukharin was condemned to death and was executed in March 1938.





Mark Sanford Odd?

23 06 2009

A look at odd behavior by US governors

The Associated Press - ‎59 minutes ago‎

South Carolina’s chief executive isn’t the first to earn headlines for acting odd….
————————–

You folks in the media have lost your freakin minds!

Can’t a guy go hiking if he wants to? What if it had been the Governor of Massachusetts Deval Patrick that wanted to go hiking by himself, what would the headlines be then?

“Rugged individualist, Governor Duval Patrick takes time to exercise his sinewy muscles by hiking and conversing with nature. It’s normal activities like this that helps the Governor make intelligent well thought out decisions. What a wonderful example he is setting for future generations.”
 
Now for the obvious…. Our media sucks!
Gio-
 




Obama Admin Hates The Poor

23 06 2009

Trade-in you're 62' Corvette for one of these babies.

Trade-in your '62 Corvette for one of these babies.

Screwing Over The Poor Again!-By Dan Scott

In another example of feel good legislation Congress has once again come up with a plan to help their primary constituents, the unions under the guise of advancing environmentalism and helping the economy. The cash for clunkers act as it is named will pay anywhere from $3,500 to $4,500 for any vehicle sold in a transaction to purchase a more fuel efficient one. As with most feel good legislation, it is ill considered with unintended consequences and a waste of taxpayer money.

Let’s examine the pertinent numbers. Under the act, $1 billion as a starter will be spent by the taxpayer to buy up (and scrap) a vehicle that gets less than 18 mpg. The better gas mileage the newer vehicle gets, the higher the amount of taxpayer money you get. Using an average $4000 as the credit that would take approximately 250,000 used cars off the road. As of 2006 there were roughly 135.4 million passenger cars, 6.7 million motorcycles and 99.1 million light trucks and SUVs. In that same year, roughly 42.6 million used vehicles were sold. Why is that important? Approximately one sixth of the total vehicles on the road are re-sold each year and that’s a sizable market. Taking 250,000 off the road would barely register at 0.6% of the annual sales volume of older vehicles. While this is a very small percentage, it will have a most pernicious effect of setting the base price for any used car at $3,500.

Once the act goes into effect, the value of the older cars goes up thus hurting those who depend upon such vehicles the most, the poor. Who do you think bought those ten-year-old cars? Let them ride the bus! So once again, the know it all, meddling, busybodies of Congress have found another regressive government policy in which to disadvantage those who are already struggling with the other ill considered ideas heaped upon them. What? Who is it insisting upon the domestic drilling ban keeping up the price of fuel? Or have you not noticed lately the rising prices, which once again threaten to derail the economy? How many thousands upon thousands of well paying energy exploration jobs have been outsourced overseas? The oil has to come from somewhere. Over $250 billion a year in capital outflow are lost due to oil imports, not counting taxes that could have been received.

Who really gains by taking some 250,000 old vehicles off the road? Certainly not the poor who cannot afford the $15,000 plus price tag for a new vehicle. Not the used car sales dealerships, since now they have lost any possible profit, nor the new car dealership since they won’t be reselling them either. Not the auto parts and repair businesses. Not the States who collect gasoline taxes for road maintenance since higher efficiency vehicles will be reducing the gasoline used. It will be the majority share owners of GM and Chrysler, the unions, since the point of the legislation is to encourage the sale of vehicles that get more miles per gallon with the rationalization that It’s good for the environment and the economy and it will be the politicians saving face in the short term keeping their pet constituencies contributing campaign dollars. The Cash for Clunkers Act is nothing more than the  Broken Window Fallacy dressed up with frilly curtains where the taxpayer is the tailor.

Sources

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/congress-passes-cash-for-clunkers-bill-offers-4500-stimulus-vouchers-to-car-owners Congress Passes Cash For Clunkers Bill, Offers $4,500 Stimulus Vouchers to Car Owners

http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/06/pimp_my_ride_dc_style.html Pimp My Ride DC Style 4,000 deaths projected over life of buy back program.

http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_11.html Table 1-11: Number of U.S. Aircraft, Vehicles, Vessels, and Other Conveyances (2006)

http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3022-autosales.html WSJ Auto Sales Data

http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_17.html Table 1-17: New and Used Passenger Car Sales and Leases





Obama “Inspired” Iranian Dissidents

23 06 2009

obama christ the light

This fraud of a president has no shame.

After strenuously avoiding to take sides in the ongoing massive protests against a rigged election in Iran, Obama is now taking credit for having “inspired” the Iranian dissidents!

What next? The Second Coming?

~Eowyn

………..

From a Washington Post article by Scott Wilson, June 23, 2009:

Obama’s advisers say the outreach may have contributed to the defeat in Lebanese elections a few days later of a coalition led by Hezbollah, an Iranian-backed party, that had been predicted to win. In recent days, administration officials have pointed to the Iranian demonstrations as further evidence of Obama’s possible influence in the region.

Asked Friday whether the administration believes Obama’s outreach to Iran and the Muslim world is affecting events on the ground, press secretary Robert Gibbs said, “You’re witnessing something that many people might not have presumed or imagined . . . just a few — even a few weeks or a few days ago.”

For the whole article, go here.





$10,000 to Obama Birth Witness!

23 06 2009
birth certificate in Pennsylvania

The latest birth certificate sign is spotted in Pennsylvania

Pssh….

Do you want to make $10,000?

Were you in Honolulu, Hawaii, 48 years ago, on August 4, 1961? More specifically, were you in a delivery room in a Honolulu hospital that day and witnessed a young woman with the odd name of Stanley (Ann) Dunham give birth to a bi-racial male baby?

If so, call Joseph Farah, the editor of World Net Daily, at 1.800.4WND.COM!

~Eowyn

………….

Farah’s $10,000 birth certificate challenge

June 22, 2009 – WorldNetDaily

WASHINGTON – WND Editor and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Farah is offering a $10,000 reward to anyone who can prove he or she was present at the birth of Barack Obama – and he’s asking Americans to donate to the cause in hopes of raising the bounty to an irresistible amount.

“Barack Obama claims to have been born in Honolulu Aug. 4, 1961,” explains Farah. “His entire constitutional claim to the presidency rests on this premise. Yet, he refuses to release a copy of his long-form birth certificate – the only document that could possibly corroborate his claim. Therefore, in the interest of truth, justice and the Constitution, I am making the extraordinary offer to entice someone to come forward with the facts of his birth – whether it took place in Hawaii or elsewhere.”

Obama has steadfastly refused to release evidence of that Hawaiian birth – a valid, long-form birth certificate that would show details of the birth, such as the hospital and the attending physician. Because the short-form “certification of live birth” he released to select news organization was at least sometimes issued for foreign births on the basis of an affidavit by one parent, it proves nothing as far as constitutional eligibility – and, in fact, raises suspicions about a foreign birth.

To date, no hospital in Hawaii has come forward to claim this historic birth.

No doctor or nurse has come forward to say they were present for that historic birth.

No witness of any kind has come forward to say they have first-hand knowledge or involvement in that historic birth – at least in Hawaii.

Obama’s paternal grandmother, Sarah Obama, claims to have been present for the birth in Mombassa, Kenya.

“It is clear now that Obama will never willingly release his birth certificate,” said Farah. “It’s time for Americans who still value the Constitution to step up and force the issue. It’s time for us to learn the truth of where Obama was born. We may find he was born in Hawaii. We may find he was born elsewhere. I have no pre-conceived ideas. But this issue has haunted the American people long enough. It’s time for some truth and transparency.”

To collect the reward, the subject must:

1. Agree to an interview with WND journalists;2. Provide persuasive evidence, such as pictures, documents or verifiable details;

3. Agree to a polygraph test.

“I think it’s disgraceful that Americans should be forced to go to such lengths by the intransigence of public officials toward accountability,” said Farah. “But that is what it has come to in 2009 with our current president. He prefers to dodge and weave, while his apologists in government and media viciously attack citizens for attempting to see that the Constitution is observed.”

Farah launched a petition drive earlier this year that has accumulated nearly 400,000 signatures demanding that all controlling legal authorities pursue proof of Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen.” That petition campaign is still on-going.

More recently, he launched a billboard campaign raising the simple question, “Where’s the birth certificate?” That campaign has raised $85,000 so far. Farah says there are plenty of billboards available, despite a ban on the campaign by several major outdoor advertising companies. But donations have dried up because of an apparent misperception among readers that billboards are not available due to the bans imposed by a few companies.

In addition, Farah points out those interested in backing his latest campaign can also raise visibility for the issue by purchasing magnetic bumper stickers, tea party rally signs and yard signs that raise the same simple question, “Where’s the birth certificate?”

All funds not used specifically for a reward will go toward the purchase of more billboard space.

If you would like to raise the reward, WND is accepting contributions in any amount. Donations can be made online, by phone and credit card or checks can be mailed to:

WND
PO Box 1627
Medford, Or 97501

To see an actual Hawaiian birth certificate from 1963 (the same era as Obama’s birth), and compare it with the Certificate of Live Birth that Obama’s election campaign peoplel put on a website, go here.





GW Supports March On DC

23 06 2009

taxpayermarch

TAXPAYER MARCH ON D.C. SEPTEMBER 10-12 2009. INFO HERE. ALSO LISTED HERE IS CHARTER BUS INFO, HOTEL INFO, AND OTHER GOODIES. MORE TRAVEL INFO HERE ON GETTING TO D.C.

That’s right folks, Giovanni’s World supports the Sept 12, 2009 march on Washington DC. Below are my personal reasons.

Let me first say that we here at GW support any and all protest marches against a tyrannical government, but there are a few reasons why the march on 9/12 is different. I believe this march may have the best chance at being effective.

  1. This march/protest will NOT be held on a Holiday when DC is devoid of politicians. The politicians need to be in town so they can hear our voice.
  2. This march will be the only march of it’s kind that weekend so it should receive it’s fair share of media coverage. And, there may be a few Motel rooms available.
  3. This march takes advantage of a date that brought all Americans together back in 2001. Remember 9/12 /2001, the day after the United States had been attacked in a most brutal fashion by scum-bag fanatics. Every American stood shoulder to shoulder in defiance of those that foolishly thought they could attack us and get away with it. We need to return to that feeling of love of country.
  4. This march also takes advantage of the 912 Project started by Glenn Beck. The connection to this project could mean an extra 1/4 million people showing up for the DC protest/march.
  5. This march will end up with some great free advertising because of the connection to the Glenn Beck program. This will make a HUGE difference.

Those are just my top 5 reasons, but I could go on. Ok, just one more….. The weather should be great. Marching on DC in the sweltering heat of summer is not fun! 

We must take back our country!

Gio-








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 30 other followers