Ok, the title is a bit over the top, but after you read the piece
below you will begin to see how I made the connection between an Obama administration, and the possibility of Fox News becoming a target, similar to what’s happening in Venezuela.
First Rush Limbaugh, who’s next?
Gio-
h/t to GiovanniWorld member littlemissmuffin.
Chavez Declares War on Opposition Media in Venezuela
CARACAS, Venezuela — As politicians in the U.S. discuss bringing back the so-called Fairness Doctrine, which would compel radio and TV stations to present both sides of any controversial issue, the question in Venezuela is far more serious: whether there can be more than one side — Hugo Chavez’s side — that gets aired about anything.
Addressing the nation on his weekly television show on Sunday, the Venezuelan president laid out plans for his next crusade, ordering his governors and mayors to draw up a “map of the media war” to determine which media are “in the hands of the oligarchy.”
Chavez said that “if it weren’t for the attack, the lies, manipulation and the exaggeration” of the private media networks, the Venezuelan government would have the support of at least 80 percent of the population. Recent polls have put Chavez’s popularity at a little over 50 percent.
Nursing a sore throat, which doctors reportedly asked him to rest by not speaking too much, (Sunday’s program lasted a mere five hours), the president told his red-clad audience that the media war is a daily conflict. “I beg you to stand up to this battle, all of you,” he implored his followers.
Chavez frequently criticizes opposition-aligned television stations and newspapers, at times holding up copies of the papers during public addresses to ridicule articles that criticize him.
Alberto Federico Ravell, director of Globovisión, a TV channel that is critical of Chávez, said he was concerned about the future of free speech in Venezuela.
“When a president talks of a map such as this, it’s nothing less than a means to attack anyone who is against him,” Ravell said. “Independent media is the only window that the Venezuelan people have to see what is really happening in the country.”
During Chavez’s recent victorious campaign to remove term limits for elected officials, a report by a media watchdog group found that over 93 percent of coverage on the state news channel, Venezolana de Televisión (VTV), was in favor of the constitutional amendment.
The report also showed that Globovisión devoted 59 percent of its coverage to the opposition.
This is not the first time opposition media have come under attack. In 2007, Chavez refused to renew the license for Radio Caracas Televisión (RCTV) on the grounds that it had played a role in a short-lived coup against the president in 2002.
Chavez accused the station of pressing “a permanent attack on public morals,” and his supporters said that any channel that supported the overthrowing of a democratically elected leader would face similar sanctions.
Since RCTV’s closure, several broadcasters have adopted a less critical line, for fear of retributions. They have “self-censored themselves,” says Carlos Bracho, a Caracas businessman, and one of the few Venezuelans who is neither with nor against the president.
Coverage is stuck between two extremes, he explains: “On Globovisión, they never broadcast anything in favor of the government, while on VTV, you will never see anything that shows any errors the government has made.”
In September 2008 Globovisión again came under fire, with a pro-Chávez group claiming responsibility for an attack on the station during which tear gas canisters were thrown at the station’s headquarters in Caracas. Leaflets were left at the scene declaring the attack on the channel a “military objective.” As the vote grew closer, Chavez distanced himself from the group and demanded the perpetrators be brought to justice.
Having suffered a crushing electoral defeat, the opposition now appears to be struggling to find a viable way to take on the seemingly invincible president.
Nevertheless, says Ravell, they remain as determined as ever: “They call us Pitiyankees (little Yankees), they accuse us of being part of the CIA. We’ve had 10 years living in fear that they’ll close us down, but we’ll keep going.”


They should ban fake news channels. Especially ones that report strictly opinionated unfactual information. Fox makes me laugh every time they have a “breaking” story. Just for fun look up their stories on the internet and see how skewed and distorted Fox’s “story” is from the truth.
Fox,
I look up their stories all the time, and unless you are going to leftist crappola sites to verify a Fox story, they get it right more often than any other news channel out there.
Did you know that most of the other channels hate Fox, because Fox are so good at what they do.
Cool huh?
Gio-
Fox is good at one thing, which is making up bullshits.
They need to grow the fuck up and stop talking like a 8 year old. American viewers are educated enough and deserve a more mature news channel. Look at how Fox attacked President Obama during his campaign, its completely unreal, unjust, and racist. Those issues do still exist, but to see them appearing on a news channel like Fox makes me feel sorry for some of the viewers.
Fox = Pathetic and complete jokes, they’re no different than celebrity gossips
Fox (and I’ll bet you’re butt-ugly),
You are referring to that cable channel that helped elect Hussein, right? MSNBC? How about ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN? All were hauling Hussein’s dirty water throughout the election. Now they ignore each and every negative about The One.
I don’t particularly like FNC, or any news outlet for that matter. But the “alphabets” are certainly biased and lean most heavily to the Left. And that IS a proven fact.
BTW, the Leftist sites are not the place where Truth resides. The sooner you realize that the sooner you will be better informed. In other words, if you cannot prove something to be fact then it is a lie. Simple?
Doktor Instructor
Umm, Fox, I recall that it was a mainstream medium, CBS News, that got into trouble over Dan Blather’s fraudulent claims about George W.
I don’t remember Fox News ever in that kind of trouble, do you? So go ahead with your phony accusations. You’re just proving that Leftists are frauds and liars.
Why does the Republican Party zealously pursue policies so obviously counter to the best interests of ordinary Americans?
Care to give us an honest example?
Gio-
Obviously not our usual Jen, I’m guessing. And they thought that would be clever.
Doktor Discover
Imposter Jen,
You’re just providing us with yet another example of the Left being rude and offensive. You barged into Gio’s World, and the first and only thing you do is to launch vague accusations.
If you have any guts or integrity, you’ll answer Gio’s question. I’ll repeat Gio’s question by breaking it down into sub-questions:
1. Exactly which Republican Party’s “policies” do you mean?
2. Specify how those policies are “obviously counter to the best interests of ordinary Americans”?
3. Please enlighten us as to what you mean by the “best interests” of ordinary Amercans?
4. And, who are these “ordinary Americans”?
Eowyn,
Don’t expect an answer from our troll Jen imposter.
I love question #4 because it then leads to question #5 which should be… “who are these extraordinary Americans”? You know, like you and I.
Gio-
Gio,
Like you, I don’t expect Imposter Jen to answer your question. That would be so un-Left of her!
BTW, today I met an extraordinary “black” man, Brandon Hills, the owner of an ice-cream shop in El Cerrito, which is right next to Berkeley. It was his positive attitude and cheerful smile that first caught my attention. I complimented him on his smile, and we started talking. Turns out he grew up in Berkeley, raised by parents who stayed together. His dad was in the military; grandmother was a churchgoer.
Mr. Hills is a conservative Christian entrepreneur. He owns another ice-cream shop in another Bay Area city. He has 4 kids; the oldest, a 15-year-old girl, is a straight-A student.
Like us, he also believes a conservative revolt is coming.
He has given me hope for the future.
Wow. I step away for the evening and one of the other gazillion “Jens” in the world stirs stuff up in my absence.
It’s Bush’s fault.
Doktor Bygone
Of course. Always.
I just had another warped thought. What if “It’s Bush’s Fault” becomes part of our lexicon not unlike “His Name Is Mud”? The meaning would be:
The speaker is much too stupid and lazy to discover the truth of the situation.
Just wondrin’.
Doktor Maxim
Hey, this is serious stuff…I don’t take this lightly…O-Team, Holder as his chief enforcer along with the FCC and FEC and of course the congress-critters will do all they can to stifle the right…even if it is the moderate voices they don’t like.
I’ve been posting about this stuff myself too here and there…great catch LMM.