Sarahs Shared Geneology Explains Her Attraction.

9 10 2008

Things make a lot of sense, at least to me, now that we know that Sarah Palin is related to Princess Diana and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, our thirty second President.

http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=10104258&ch=4226716&src=news

Think about it…. She has that same grace that Princess Di was famous for. Then to top it off, she has the political tools in her genes that FDR had. I’m guessing both would be very proud of her, I know I am!

                                      


Actions

Information

15 responses

9 10 2008
Steve

Hey CT, That would explain the Charisma, and plain old common sense, which is scarying the Libs, out of their MINDs sjanus11 steve see ya around, been on LOA

9 10 2008
ken

Hey Steve, I don’t think the libs are scaryed at all. They’re already gloating about winning .

9 10 2008
giovanniworld

ken,

Winning what? If you are talking about the White House, then surely you jest!

9 10 2008
Steve

Ken…..Gloating is one thing……But crapping your pants is another and if you don’t think barry et al are quaking in there boots, well , well , well why don’t you play the RACISM card, that’s all he’s got left. IF the G.D. MSM would do it’s job, barry would be a goner, as it is with them as official supporters he’s up by 3-4-5 PATHETIC He should be leading by double digits, and until he does……………He will lose this election…Mark my words……..what say you…….Am I a Racist now cause I don’t won’t a socialist Gov. I could hive a shit if he was purple……..He’s not the best candidate, and all’s they have left is race card……seewhat Harry Reid said Today LOLhttp://www.breitbart.tv/html/192383.html Steve

9 10 2008
giovanniworld

Steve,

Once again a lefty proves how ignorant they are.

I consider myself a Conservative, and almost every Conservative I have ever known truly believe the words that came from MLK. Especially the one about judging a man by the content of his character, not the color of his skin. I wonder why you never hear liberals mention this quote???

9 10 2008
Steve

Hey CT…Or what do I call you here? Anyway you see Acorn is starting to take it in the shorts in “Multiple” investigations with witnesses………………Love it. Do you know the Bail out Package had/ or still does have Money alloted for Acorn? And your right the so called “Party of inclusion” NEVER EVER uses MLK’S words about Character. It’s always left to a True Conservetive American, who often , Not me, I throw the other way, that they are not Racist… The Biggist G.D. Racists are the flaming Retard Libs……….That’s all they got Steve

9 10 2008
Eowyn

Yes, Giovanni, the discovery of Governor Palin’s lineage does explain a lot! What a pedigree. I wonder to what genealogy roots BO can be traced? You can bet on it that somebody’s done it but will not divulge what was found because the results were unflattering.

10 10 2008
G

I really don’t think Sarah Palin has quite the same grace as Princess Di. That’s quite a stretch. FDR might have been proud of her political skills, the ones that ferried her from a hockey mom to a VP hopeful. He wouldn’t have agreed with her much though. I don’t think many of us would agree with him either.

@Eowyn: BHO is “related” to Dick Cheney and Brad Pitt. I’m sorry if you were hoping for Timothy McVeigh.

@Steve: What did you just say??

@Giovanni: Truly believing MLKs words would mean that you would judge based on character, not their genes or genealogy. You really believe relatives that distant, with one common ancestor ~400 years ago, explains character traits in people? I’m not even much like my first cousins, and I can’t even imagine what my fourth cousins are like. This doesn’t change the fact that Palin is ambitious beyond her ability, just as Obama is. This is the type of topic the prevents me from tuning in to ‘news’ channels on the TV. This is fluff. Sorry.

@Everyone: I think there’s some projection going on here with the racism.

10 10 2008
Ed Raven

Right on, G; Sarah Palin could be related to Charlemagne and Solomon The Wise. It still wouldn’t change the fact that she’s a total ditz.

10 10 2008
Steve

Hey G…..Are you confused about “ACORN” those are the people who register Dead People and Fix elections for Dems. You did not understand that………….Or was it the part about them being under all sorts of investigations…..Steve

10 10 2008
Steve

Hey, G….Off Topic, Remember story about barry wanting to keep troops in iraq longer, from few weeks ago on NB, Breaking again. It’s a Felony to negotiate, whilst a sitting president is at war………forget the law name… And Acorn, being charged, I thing MSM is finally coming around

..http://washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/10/obama-sought-to-sway-iraqis-on-bush-deal/ Steve

10 10 2008
Eowyn

@G:

You wrote: “@Eowyn: BHO is “related” to Dick Cheney and Brad Pitt. I’m sorry if you were hoping for Timothy McVeigh.”

You don’t seem to be able to read well. Please show me WHERE I had written that I was “hoping for Timothy McVeigh” to be in Obama’s genealogical roots? All you’ve demonstrated is the Lunatic Left just can’t stop mud-slinging. You also tetelegraph that there’s no point in my being gracious to you. Casting pearls before swine.

11 10 2008
G

@Eowyn: You asked about BOs roots and then concluded that it was a safe bet that his genealogy was unflattering.
I’m sorry, maybe you didn’t understand the tone of my post. Timothy McVeigh was supposed to be an obvious sarcastic reference to the domestic terrorist mud-slinging on BO. The implication was supposed to be, “what did you expect when you said unflattering?”

I don’t what you make of his genealogy, but I’ll let you know that I make nothing of it.

Yet again, you make the assumption that I am from the Lunatic Liberal Left. In your mind I must be one of those who believes that Jesus would choose Obama, that is he the Messiah. Your justification for these assumptions is that I don’t agree with you. It’s ironic that you would accuse me of mud-slinging; and doubly ironic that you would make such an accusation on this site.

@Steve: I was asking about this part of your post-

“It’s always left to a True Conservetive American, who often , Not me, I throw the other way, that they are not Racist… The Biggist G.D. Racists are the flaming Retard Libs……….”

I do not understand that sentence.

11 10 2008
Steve

G,
Yeah, I guess It’s confusing, what I was trying to say was as a Conservetive we are always on the defensive to prove we are not Racist………….What I was saying is I don’t need to prove myself and will call the other side for the racist crap they always pull……………make sense now, cause I know in Rereading I even said what the Hell did I write LOL Steve

12 10 2008
rosel

http://dianarn.wordpress.com/2008/03/25/obama-related-to-bush-cheney-churchill/

Obama and Palin are each related to a lot of those fancy people. I bet most of the people in this country with–like both Obama and Palin– white-anglo-saxon-protestant ancestors could show the same thing–it just means that those pilgrims/colonialists were very prolific and their lines did not all die out. I bet most black americans — descendants of former slaves– could show the same thing– since most have some white ancestry– and the slave owners were part of the w.a.s.p. ruling class.

Leave a comment